futuremd
Banned
- 6,448
- 1,433
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
I will say though...the stuff about shemales is pretty wild. I mean I don't doubt that people are attracted to it, nor do I disagree with his conclusions, I've just never been interested in that.
Ogi Ogas's Theory of Sexual Desire:Why men/women like what they like(48min. vid.) Cliffs included
- 29,930
- 8,487
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
What parts of Ogas's argument do you think are incorrect?
- 17,144
- 1,167
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
dude most sudies i ever seen show that women are a significant minority, men are the vast vast majority of porn users. big **** porn, men are the consumers of this not women.
i agree, girl on girl porn, is super boring half the time if im going to watch gianna or whoever, im moe often going to watch straight porn than gil on girl. in fact if im watching porn with a girl i more likely to put on girl on girl, because i found that girls get into that way more than some video of pinky geting rammed.
The visuals are huge. Guys can better visualize sex with a girl with heterosexual porn. I don't know about the big **** porn. Power maybe?
To me its on the same level as watching sports highlights videos on Youtube. Maybe I was the only one, but before going to play football, I would watch highlight videos to get pumped up.
Last edited:
iamdavidrice
Banned
- 548
- 24
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2011
HThe whole argument basically is saying that everyone is the same and thinks the same which is idiotic...Using words like "most" and "everyone" foh
- 19,637
- 12,664
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
That's what stood out to me also. We all see it but the explanation as to why they switch hit is not just them being "confused"
Dudes are so focused on the shemale aspect they're missing out on the other gems being dropped.
Last edited:
futuremd
Banned
- 6,448
- 1,433
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
The major beef I have with this study is that it once again ONLY focuses on male homosexuality.
- 19,637
- 12,664
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
Did you watch the entire video? He said the lesbians they approached didn't want to discuss their sexuality with a straight man.
Anyone who deals with women in general knows that they aren't nearly as vocal about sex as men.
Last edited:
- 29,930
- 8,487
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
I don't recall him saying that everyone is the same.
From the research he did of what 100 million people anonymously search for, he found out what was being searched for the most and why his theory can explain why people like certain genres.
futuremd
Banned
- 6,448
- 1,433
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
I did watch it. I made this comment here when he said it in the last 5 or so minutes.
I understand that female sexuality is more "fluid" but I just hate how these studies always focus on males as if we're the ones that need that much more intensive study than women.
- 29,930
- 8,487
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
If anyone's interested in reading the book, here's are all the chapter titles.
CHAPTER 1 - What Do We Really Like?
CHAPTER 2 - Monkey Pay-Per-View
CHAPTER 3 - Elmer Fudd, Wabbit Hunter
CHAPTER 4 - The Miss Marple Detective Agency
CHAPTER 5 - Ladies Prefer Alphas
CHAPTER 6 - The Sisterhood of the Magic Hoo Hoo
CHAPTER 7 - Boys Will Be Boys
CHAPTER 8 - A Tall Man with a Nice Tush
CHAPTER 9 - Cheating Wives and Girls Gone Wild
CHAPTER 10 - Lords and Lordosis
CHAPTER 11 - Erotical Illusions
You can read the 1st chapter here.
http://www.billionwickedthoughts.com/sample.html
CHAPTER 1 - What Do We Really Like?
CHAPTER 2 - Monkey Pay-Per-View
CHAPTER 3 - Elmer Fudd, Wabbit Hunter
CHAPTER 4 - The Miss Marple Detective Agency
CHAPTER 5 - Ladies Prefer Alphas
CHAPTER 6 - The Sisterhood of the Magic Hoo Hoo
CHAPTER 7 - Boys Will Be Boys
CHAPTER 8 - A Tall Man with a Nice Tush
CHAPTER 9 - Cheating Wives and Girls Gone Wild
CHAPTER 10 - Lords and Lordosis
CHAPTER 11 - Erotical Illusions
You can read the 1st chapter here.
http://www.billionwickedthoughts.com/sample.html
- 19,637
- 12,664
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
They can only study subjects who want to be a part study. If female scientists did something on this I'm sure more women would participate more. I doubt there are many females scientists who want to though.
I bet if you tried to show females this video most wouldn't even want to watch.
- 17,144
- 1,167
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
You read this yet?
http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/09/understanding-females-sexual-fluidity/
Understanding females' sexual fluidity
Ian Kerner, a sexuality counselor and New York Times best-selling author, blogs about sex on Thursdays on The Chart. Read more from him on his website, GoodInBed.
Actress Cynthia Nixon made headlines recently when she said during an interview that she “chooses” to be a lesbian.
“I’ve been straight and I’ve been gay, and gay is better,” she said. “For me, it is a choice.”
As you might expect, her comments – published in a New York Times Magazine profile - set off a firestorm of controversy, with gay activists and others worrying that Nixon’s words would give credence to those who claim that being gay is a conscious decision, not a genetic certainty.
(She later clarified that she identifies most closely as a bisexual, which, she says, is a “fact,” not a choice.)
But, divisive wording aside, there may be something to Nixon’s remarks. The actress, who was once in a long-term relationship with a man and who is now engaged to a woman, appears to be an example of what scientists are now terming “sexual fluidity.” In other words, she may be attracted to a specific person rather than a particular gender.
It’s a phenomenon that Lisa Diamond, a University of Utah psychology professor, has studied extensively. In her 2008 book, “Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire,” she writes that women’s sexuality appears to be much more fluid than men’s, and that this fluidity tends to involve three main characteristics:
– Non-exclusivity in attractions: can find either gender sexually attractive
– Changes in attractions: can suddenly find a man or woman sexually attractive after having been in a long-term relationship with the other
– Attraction to the person, not the gender
Research seems to support the idea that some women are able to move between relationships with both genders without blinking an eye - and that labels matter little. In a 2008 study, Diamond followed 70 lesbian, bisexual, and “unlabeled” women over the course of 10 years.
During that decade, two-thirds of the women changed their initial identity labels, and one-third of these changed labels at least twice. And although conventional wisdom suggests that more women would transition out of the bisexual and unlabeled groups and into the more “standard” groups of heterosexuality or homosexuality, this was not the case.
As Diamond writes, “More women adopted bisexual/unlabeled identities than relinquished these identities; few bisexual/unlabeled women ended up identifying as lesbian or heterosexual. Overall, the most commonly adopted identity was ‘unlabeled.’”
So is sexual fluidity unique to women? Possibly, says sexuality educator Emily Nagoski, author of the "Good in Bed Guide to Female Orgasms."
“Making space for fluidity as a legitimate part of sexual orientation would help women, but it surely couldn’t hurt men. Men have some fluidity too, just not as much,” she writes. “It’s different for girls, this sexual orientation thing.”
She points to a variety of studies that help bolster this idea: For instance, research in men has found genetic differences that may be associated with homosexuality, but similar inheritability of sexual orientation has not yet been identified in women.
Plus, Nagoski adds, “Women’s experience of sexual orientation is more discontinuous and variable than men’s, which more typically emerges early and stays the same over different situations.” So, while most men tend to identify themselves as straight, gay, or bisexual relatively early in life, many women may have relationships with both men and women without choosing a specific sexual orientation.
Women may also be more receptive than men to a variety of sexual cues. For their recent book, “A Billion Wicked Thoughts,” neuroscientists Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam analyzed a billion web searches, a million websites, a million erotic videos, a million erotic stories, millions of personal ads and tens of thousands of digitized romance novels in order to better understand the sexual differences between men and women. They concluded that a single cue triggers arousal in the male brain, but that women’s brains require multiple cues to become aroused.
Similarly, research from the University of Toronto found that while men who identified themselves as heterosexual or homosexual became sexually aroused by straight or gay pornography, respectively, women were much more complicated: Regardless of their identified orientation, straight, gay, and bisexual women became physically aroused by a whole range of sexual imagery, including male–male, male–female, and female–female pornography. They were even turned on by images of mating monkeys, although they didn’t admit it.
Of course, we shouldn’t interpret these findings as proof that all heterosexual women are sexually attracted to other women, or to monkeys for that matter.
But they do suggest that women may be more capable of finding people and things attractive, no matter what orientation they claim. Perhaps that’s why an estimated 95% of straight men who fantasize about or partake in threesomes are only interested in being with two women, while more heterosexual women are open to adding another woman or man to the mix.
In the end, Cynthia Nixon’s comments and the conversation they’ve started may reveal less about the actress’s romantic leanings than our own preconceived notions about sexual orientation.
Maybe the lesson here is that love and lust are about people, not about labels - and I think that can only be a good thing.
Post by: Ian Kerner Ph.D. - sex counselor
Filed under: Sex
Understanding females' sexual fluidity
Ian Kerner, a sexuality counselor and New York Times best-selling author, blogs about sex on Thursdays on The Chart. Read more from him on his website, GoodInBed.
Actress Cynthia Nixon made headlines recently when she said during an interview that she “chooses” to be a lesbian.
“I’ve been straight and I’ve been gay, and gay is better,” she said. “For me, it is a choice.”
As you might expect, her comments – published in a New York Times Magazine profile - set off a firestorm of controversy, with gay activists and others worrying that Nixon’s words would give credence to those who claim that being gay is a conscious decision, not a genetic certainty.
(She later clarified that she identifies most closely as a bisexual, which, she says, is a “fact,” not a choice.)
But, divisive wording aside, there may be something to Nixon’s remarks. The actress, who was once in a long-term relationship with a man and who is now engaged to a woman, appears to be an example of what scientists are now terming “sexual fluidity.” In other words, she may be attracted to a specific person rather than a particular gender.
It’s a phenomenon that Lisa Diamond, a University of Utah psychology professor, has studied extensively. In her 2008 book, “Sexual Fluidity: Understanding Women’s Love and Desire,” she writes that women’s sexuality appears to be much more fluid than men’s, and that this fluidity tends to involve three main characteristics:
– Non-exclusivity in attractions: can find either gender sexually attractive
– Changes in attractions: can suddenly find a man or woman sexually attractive after having been in a long-term relationship with the other
– Attraction to the person, not the gender
Research seems to support the idea that some women are able to move between relationships with both genders without blinking an eye - and that labels matter little. In a 2008 study, Diamond followed 70 lesbian, bisexual, and “unlabeled” women over the course of 10 years.
During that decade, two-thirds of the women changed their initial identity labels, and one-third of these changed labels at least twice. And although conventional wisdom suggests that more women would transition out of the bisexual and unlabeled groups and into the more “standard” groups of heterosexuality or homosexuality, this was not the case.
As Diamond writes, “More women adopted bisexual/unlabeled identities than relinquished these identities; few bisexual/unlabeled women ended up identifying as lesbian or heterosexual. Overall, the most commonly adopted identity was ‘unlabeled.’”
So is sexual fluidity unique to women? Possibly, says sexuality educator Emily Nagoski, author of the "Good in Bed Guide to Female Orgasms."
“Making space for fluidity as a legitimate part of sexual orientation would help women, but it surely couldn’t hurt men. Men have some fluidity too, just not as much,” she writes. “It’s different for girls, this sexual orientation thing.”
She points to a variety of studies that help bolster this idea: For instance, research in men has found genetic differences that may be associated with homosexuality, but similar inheritability of sexual orientation has not yet been identified in women.
Plus, Nagoski adds, “Women’s experience of sexual orientation is more discontinuous and variable than men’s, which more typically emerges early and stays the same over different situations.” So, while most men tend to identify themselves as straight, gay, or bisexual relatively early in life, many women may have relationships with both men and women without choosing a specific sexual orientation.
Women may also be more receptive than men to a variety of sexual cues. For their recent book, “A Billion Wicked Thoughts,” neuroscientists Ogi Ogas and Sai Gaddam analyzed a billion web searches, a million websites, a million erotic videos, a million erotic stories, millions of personal ads and tens of thousands of digitized romance novels in order to better understand the sexual differences between men and women. They concluded that a single cue triggers arousal in the male brain, but that women’s brains require multiple cues to become aroused.
Similarly, research from the University of Toronto found that while men who identified themselves as heterosexual or homosexual became sexually aroused by straight or gay pornography, respectively, women were much more complicated: Regardless of their identified orientation, straight, gay, and bisexual women became physically aroused by a whole range of sexual imagery, including male–male, male–female, and female–female pornography. They were even turned on by images of mating monkeys, although they didn’t admit it.
Of course, we shouldn’t interpret these findings as proof that all heterosexual women are sexually attracted to other women, or to monkeys for that matter.
But they do suggest that women may be more capable of finding people and things attractive, no matter what orientation they claim. Perhaps that’s why an estimated 95% of straight men who fantasize about or partake in threesomes are only interested in being with two women, while more heterosexual women are open to adding another woman or man to the mix.
In the end, Cynthia Nixon’s comments and the conversation they’ve started may reveal less about the actress’s romantic leanings than our own preconceived notions about sexual orientation.
Maybe the lesson here is that love and lust are about people, not about labels - and I think that can only be a good thing.
Post by: Ian Kerner Ph.D. - sex counselor
Filed under: Sex
- 17,144
- 1,167
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
Looks @ Shemale porn to test personal level of gayness..............
not even Moderate wood...........
Sorry........
Delete that from your history bro.
futuremd
Banned
- 6,448
- 1,433
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
What does that mean?
Just liking them? being attracted to them? or actually having sex with them?
How do you measure "liking" something?
Characteristics are merely an attempt at making a model of behavior, but they don't work when you're trying to incorporate those that don't fit into two "neat" categories.
This doesn't make sense.
Completely and absolutely, FALSE.
Agreed
But you replied to me....
- 9,250
- 1,689
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2008
NT's collective awe and fascination of Ramon, da monster, and da monster's bump proves that the penis is def in the top 4.
Watched the whole vid, and son basically said what we all know, men are physical and women are emotional.
You ever seen hetero-hardcore-porn for women?
Way too much kissing and cuddling and not enough wall breaking and jack hammering.
Watched the whole vid, and son basically said what we all know, men are physical and women are emotional.
You ever seen hetero-hardcore-porn for women?
Way too much kissing and cuddling and not enough wall breaking and jack hammering.
truthgetsbusy
Banned
- 4,871
- 257
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2007
Hey Putty fall back.....when don't need the videos, charts, graphs, memes, political cartoons, or powerpoints in here ok.
- 17,144
- 1,167
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2005
You must be new here.
- 1,845
- 338
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2009
- 18,373
- 33,982
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2004
The necessity of sex for reproduction and the desire/enjoyment of sex are two different processes.
The two ideas (sex for reproduction and sex for enjoyment) tend to go hand-in-hand only because it evolved that way as a means of survival.
It's too bad the politicization of homosexuality has precluded an open and honest discussion of it. For example, the defense for "your sexual orientation is your choice, so society can you hold you accountable for it" is "homosexuality is not a choice." When, in reality, the defense should be, "it doesn't matter if it's a choice."
Add to this the strong association between sexual preference and personality type (magnified by the media) and it's no wonder that there is so much bias. Honest discussion is stifled before it can begin.
The two ideas (sex for reproduction and sex for enjoyment) tend to go hand-in-hand only because it evolved that way as a means of survival.
It's too bad the politicization of homosexuality has precluded an open and honest discussion of it. For example, the defense for "your sexual orientation is your choice, so society can you hold you accountable for it" is "homosexuality is not a choice." When, in reality, the defense should be, "it doesn't matter if it's a choice."
Add to this the strong association between sexual preference and personality type (magnified by the media) and it's no wonder that there is so much bias. Honest discussion is stifled before it can begin.
Last edited:
D
Deleted member 38307
Guest
I've never been interested in shemale porn in the slightest. Where is this info in the vid coming from? Were survey's taken?
Last edited by a moderator:
- 29,930
- 8,487
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2011
The info is from anonyomus web searches, websites, etc.
Surveys were taken.
b smooth 202
Banned
- 10,295
- 106
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2004
SMH its too obvious :x
Last edited:
yeold360s
Banned
- 591
- 102
- Joined
- Jul 24, 2012
Son is trying to redefine heterosexuality, though.
As if the past millions of years have had no bearing on where we are today.
As if the past millions of years have had no bearing on where we are today.
- 27,294
- 15,000
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2011
Just because you break a word down to the point where you've undefined it, doesn't mean the term isn't defined anymore.
heterosexuality does exist.
And asking more questions because you didn't get the exact answer you were looking for, stated in the exact way you were waiting for, doesn't mean your question wasn't answered.
heterosexuality does exist.
And asking more questions because you didn't get the exact answer you were looking for, stated in the exact way you were waiting for, doesn't mean your question wasn't answered.
Last edited:
