Based on what you're saying, don't you think it would be appropriate to focus on the mental aspect of the issue? If a child were to express a belief that they are an elf, would we resort to shaving their ears to accommodate them? What about those who identify as animals or even robots?
There is a focus on mental health issues. A lot trans adults and kids see mental health professionals. Access forms of medical intervention often require it. Famb like I said, my girlfriend is a therapist. She treats trans kids. She used to treat trans adults. She used to be a social work and had trans clients.
Secondly, I think deriding gender dysphoria as being the same as someone thinking there are an elf is a bad faith way to discuss a serious issue.
It is overly dismissive to the point of being disrespectful.
Seems like you feel the focus should be on trying to talk people out of being trans. And that is the outcome mental health professionals should focus.
I disagree. I don't have an issue with transgender people exist. If transitioning improves someone's quality of life, then good for them.
Additionally, how is it possible for a 5-year-old to have knowledge about puberty and its effects on their body to the extent that they would feel the need to quickly transition before they reach a certain age? This is adults making drastic descinions based on childrens whimsical thoughts.
Famb, most kids don't transition at 5
It is bad faith to act like a 5 year is representative of the population of trans kids.
I would not support transitioning a kid at 5.
This is still a relatively new situation. How can we be sure that more people won't eventually come forward, expressing regret for their previous actions? This is still a relatively new situation. How can we be sure that more people won't eventually come forward, expressing regret for their previous actions? Do you believe that there could be more people who regret their decision, but their concerns are not adequately represented because it goes against the agenda they are promoting?
I am certain more people will regret it.
People in the past have regretted it.
My point is that more people regretting it doesn't say much without more context. The amount of people transitioning has been on a sharp increase over the past few years. So you will obviously get more people being regretful and destransitioning. Just like you will get the opposite. A lot more people will not regret it, and e happy about the decision.
What matter are the percentages and how they shift or don't shift. I think that the regret rate is from previous research is like in the low si gle digits of people that regret it.
Most adults that transition don't regret it. So things have to change a lot going forward. Maybe they do, but it is hard for me to imagine it would.
So then if they isn't some massive shift toward regret, people like you would be arguing against a medical intervention that shows positive results majority of the tim.
Like I said to DC, the math hill is a tough one to climb for people against minors transitioning.
"According to an online
survey of detransitioners conducted by Dr. Lisa Littman last year, 40% said their gender dysphoria was caused by a mental-health condition and 62% felt medical professionals did not investigate whether trauma was a factor in their transition decisions.
“My dysphoria collided with my general depression issues and body image issues,” Helena recalled. “I just came to the conclusion that I was born in the wrong body and that all my problems in life would be solved if I transitioned.”"
A look at the alarming rise of teens who are changing genders and then “detransitioning” back.
nypost.com
I don't think the stats are saying what you think it says.
It is not a representative survey of the entire trans population. It is a survey of detransitioners. Which makes up a small share of the general population.
It like like seeing 1000 people eat at a restaurant. Then you survey 20 of them said they regret eating there. With 60 percent the service was bad.
It is not 60% of the people who eat at the restaurant saying the service was bad. It is actually 1.2% saying it is. The survey results only tell us info about a small share of trans individuals. Not enough to make judgement about the overall community.
So it would be denying something that has a positive benefit to the median case, and the majority of the population, because of the regrets of a marginal cases.
That doesn't seem logical to me.
-Sorry, but I think a lot of folk feel that someone needs to be a far left social progressive or captured by some cutting edge gender theory. Basic math tells me these arguments are not very compelling.
My opinion might change if time shows sizeable enough shifts. But given the info right now. Nah.