- 16,543
- 7,757
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2013
Very true, but let's also factor in Morrissey's not so stellar history (e.g. selling tickets and then canceling his shows).let's keep it real, supreme ain't really no saints either so who knows what really happenedMorrissey is in the wrong here.
1.) From a legal standpoint and just being real, Supreme went out of its way to accommodate Morrissey.
2.) Supreme most likely had an ironclad contract with Morrissey and he signed / agreed with it.
3.) Morrissey basically took all the money he was paid and tried to play Supreme.
4.) As such, Supreme is right to divulge the details and their side sounds much more reasonable than he does.
Scumbag move on Morrissey's part. Wouldn't be surprised if he wanted a cut of the t-shirt sales to "remedy" the situation.
No one made Morrissey do this photo shoot; this wouldn't have been an issue if he just returned the money or worked with Supreme without airing dirty laundry. Now it just looks bad on both of their parts and Morrissey walks away like a scorned lover (yet he had all the power).
Last edited: