- 12,389
- 2,910
Skins tagged Cousins but still a possibility of getting traded
:::[Official] San Francisco 49ers 2024 Season Thread [2-2 vs Cardinals 10/07 1:05PST]:::
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by niketalker23,
- Start date
- 3,410
- 938
Cousins aint getting traded per ian rapport
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-netwo...s-not-going-anywhere-won-t-be-traded-to-49ers
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-netwo...s-not-going-anywhere-won-t-be-traded-to-49ers
Last edited:
lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
Wouldn't wanna trade for him with a franchise tag anyway.
- 28,091
- 9,213
What difference does the tag make? We would be trading for him, not signing him.
- 31,246
- 21,149
All good if niners can't trade for him. Best case scenario is skins and cousins still can't come to an agreement and cousins walks next year and hopefully still wants to sign with us after a year of us rebuilding and developing.
lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
I'm not ok with giving up any high picks for a rental. Cousins is still going to look for a big contract. Given who is in charge of contracts that's not likely, so we'd be giving up a possible core piece to have Cousins for a year. I can understand a team like the Broncos doing this because they're Super Bowl ready, we are not.
Edit: I would much rather have the Skins come to a contract agreement then trade him.
Edit: I would much rather have the Skins come to a contract agreement then trade him.
Last edited:
- 28,091
- 9,213
I am still lost as to why you think that the Skins putting the exclusive franchise tag on him makes any difference in regard to us trading for him. Why are you assuming this would be a rental?
Last edited:
lightweight champion
Banned
- 13,481
- 5,271
Paraag is cheap. He won't offer a deal that Cousins is looking for. If the Skins get him to sign to a contract and we trade for him it takes Paraag out of the picture.
- 31,246
- 21,149
Man. Can't wait. Combine Friday!
- 28,091
- 9,213
What contract is he signing with Washington though? The only reason Cousins might be an option is because he CANT agree to a contract. He isnt going to sign a contract and then get traded. The only reason a trade is even talked about is because Cousins and the ******** are not on the same page.
Sorry bro. I am still lost. lol
- 31,246
- 21,149
Hightower not gettin tagged by pats 
- 12,336
- 7,091
This
He just had a procedure, so I am not exactly sure how healthy he is atm. But he's a top 10 talent in this draft.
I like him a lot. Dude stays injured, tho.Hightower not gettin tagged by pats
Last edited:
- 1,439
- 320
I'm really starting to wonder what these guys are thinking too.
IF we were to get Cousins, guys, we'd work out a long term deal beforehand. so that tag wouldn't apply to us. he'd be under contract.
no way a team would trade for a guy with 1 year left. Unless you're N.O. trading for Boogie.
this ain't happening. he'd probably come in under a 5 year deal.
- 5,554
- 3,553
He got the exclusive tag tho so the mandatory compensation is 2, 1st round picks. Maybe in 2018 but this year he's out the question.
- 1,439
- 320
you have it mixed up. had he got the non exclusive 2, 1st rounders would have been an option for compensation.
- 5,554
- 3,553
Your correct my bad.
- 28,091
- 9,213
You guys are both wrong. Cousins got the exclusive tag. All that means is that the Skins have all the power to negotiate a trade, and Cousins cant seek a contract on his own. If he did sign an offer sheet with another team, said team would send the Skins 2 first rounders as compensation.
With the exclusive, it is the Skins job to negotiate terms of a trade. There is no "forced 2 first rounders" as compensation.
Last edited:
- 1,439
- 320
not trying to argue, but exactly how am I wrong? I simply stated that with the non exclusive, the compensation would've been apart of the process had he ended up here in SF. i said nothing in regards to him negotiating his own deal. neither did Aaron.
- 28,091
- 9,213
My bad. I got all dyslexic and thought I read He had got not had he got. My fault bro.
Last edited:
- 12,336
- 7,091
Since I really don't want to use the #2 pick on a QB and I don't believe Mahomes will be there in the second, Nate Peterman is slowly becoming my guy.
@22stylez I'll post my most recent mock that doesn't revolve around a QB at 2 after free agency. There are no redundant players, so it gives a new set of players to watch out for.
@22stylez I'll post my most recent mock that doesn't revolve around a QB at 2 after free agency. There are no redundant players, so it gives a new set of players to watch out for.
Last edited:
- 31,246
- 21,149
Since I really don't want to use the #2 pick on a QB and I don't believe Mahomes will be there in the second, Nate Peterman is slowly becoming my guy.
@22stylez
I'll post my most recent mock that doesn't revolve around a QB at 2 after free agency. There are no redundant players, so it gives a new set of players to watch out for.
Good stuff. Was waiting for another good read
- 14,509
- 7,707
We gonna need Kaep or Matt Schaub, much as it kills me to say it
Last edited:
- 12,336
- 7,091
Yup, it sucks, but we need one of those guys.
ef
ef
Last edited:
- 14,509
- 7,707
See if we can finagle Kaep for one more rodeo because I don't think we want a QB in the first round either way and Matt Shaub ******* sucks
- 88,737
- 47,947
i rather see spuds ******* mackenzie out there throwing for us than have kap back in a niner uniform
