- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,233
- 202,669
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
- Jul 15, 2018
- 2,996
- 7,850
aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,563
- 90,838
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,842
- 38,462
Clearly Trump is worried in some form about his videotaped admission to Lester Holt 2 days after firing Comey. Now all of a sudden the audio and video of his remarks is "fudged."
It wouldn't be the first time Trump tries to later declare his own remarks on camera and audio are fake. Usually long after already acknowledging the matter to defend it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/us/politics/trump-access-hollywood-tape.html (November 28 2017)
Trump Once Said the ‘Access Hollywood’ Tape Was Real. Now He’s Not Sure.
Shortly after his victory last year, Donald J. Trump began revisiting one of his deepest public humiliations: the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape of him making vulgar comments about women.
Despite his public acknowledgment of the recording’s authenticity in the final days of the presidential campaign — and his hasty videotaped apology under pressure from his advisers — Mr. Trump as president-elect began raising the prospect with allies that it may not have been him on the tape after all.
Most of Mr. Trump’s aides ignored his changing story. But in January, shortly before his inauguration, Mr. Trump told a Republican senator that he wanted to investigate the recording that had him boasting about grabbing women’s genitals.
“We don’t think that was my voice,” Mr. Trump told the senator, according to a person familiar with the conversation. Since then, Mr. Trump has continued to suggest that the tape that nearly upended his campaign was not actually him, according to three people close to the president.
It wouldn't be the first time Trump tries to later declare his own remarks on camera and audio are fake. Usually long after already acknowledging the matter to defend it.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/28/us/politics/trump-access-hollywood-tape.html (November 28 2017)
Trump Once Said the ‘Access Hollywood’ Tape Was Real. Now He’s Not Sure.
Shortly after his victory last year, Donald J. Trump began revisiting one of his deepest public humiliations: the infamous “Access Hollywood” tape of him making vulgar comments about women.
Despite his public acknowledgment of the recording’s authenticity in the final days of the presidential campaign — and his hasty videotaped apology under pressure from his advisers — Mr. Trump as president-elect began raising the prospect with allies that it may not have been him on the tape after all.
Most of Mr. Trump’s aides ignored his changing story. But in January, shortly before his inauguration, Mr. Trump told a Republican senator that he wanted to investigate the recording that had him boasting about grabbing women’s genitals.
“We don’t think that was my voice,” Mr. Trump told the senator, according to a person familiar with the conversation. Since then, Mr. Trump has continued to suggest that the tape that nearly upended his campaign was not actually him, according to three people close to the president.
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,218
- 179,710
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,842
- 38,462
For the record, here is Trump's Lester Holt interview. His comments about the Russia investigation regarrding Comey's firing start at about 0:50
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
Not what you signed up for?
This is like someone getting a job at a manure company, then complaining about all the bull ****.
They knew what they were getting into
- Feb 23, 2010
- 23,404
- 26,483
You hitch your wagon to this clown, can’t be shocked when everyone gets dysentery and all the axles are busted.
Good riddance.
Good riddance.
- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,145
- 29,489
Here is the problem,
the kind of people attracted to working for Trump are crooks,
BUT crooks don't like scrutiny...but because Trump is, ya know, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITES STATES it means, in the words of the great Tauheed "Tity Boi" Eppsthe "THE FEDS ARE WATCHING".
That mean what should be your chief applicant pool; low bottom crooks....are dis-incentivized to apply.
It's really a classic corporate recruitment problem.
the kind of people attracted to working for Trump are crooks,
BUT crooks don't like scrutiny...but because Trump is, ya know, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITES STATES it means, in the words of the great Tauheed "Tity Boi" Eppsthe "THE FEDS ARE WATCHING".
That mean what should be your chief applicant pool; low bottom crooks....are dis-incentivized to apply.
It's really a classic corporate recruitment problem.
- Jan 11, 2014
- 8,620
- 17,205
The access hollywood tape was clearly doctored, and this was proven by Dr Billy Wayne Ruddick Jr, PhD on a showtime exposé. I wouldn't be surprised if the fake news also doctored up the holt interview.
Last edited:
aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,563
- 90,838
- Jul 18, 2013
- 32,880
- 81,663
- Jul 27, 2012
- 11,445
- 18,525
These are only the best people though.
But all jokes aside, they knew what they were signing themselves up for by joining the circus. If you were cool with the clown show when things were going good, you have no right to complain when Trump does Trump things and there’s no type of stability or structure. You knew the type of person you signed up to work for. Can’t complain when the going gets tough.
But all jokes aside, they knew what they were signing themselves up for by joining the circus. If you were cool with the clown show when things were going good, you have no right to complain when Trump does Trump things and there’s no type of stability or structure. You knew the type of person you signed up to work for. Can’t complain when the going gets tough.
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,218
- 179,710
Speaking of Mueller,his investigation is running pretty deep...
Real tears will be had if James O'Keefe ends up in jail
Real tears will be had if James O'Keefe ends up in jail
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
Speaking of Mueller,his investigation is running pretty deep...
Real tears will be had if James O'Keefe ends up in jail
But, but, but, I was told da Project Vertias was outchea exposing the truth regarding da libs.
What gives?
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,218
- 179,710
I remember the wind was blowing through with that veritas stuff in here a while back only for it do be exposed as literal fake news not long after
Warms my heart to see O'Keefe in the Feds' crosshairs
Warms my heart to see O'Keefe in the Feds' crosshairs
- May 23, 2005
- 63,609
- 50,740
Real question
Why didn’t Obama take care of this while in office????
The water thing in Michigan happened before the election right???
- Mar 16, 2010
- 147,218
- 179,710
*wrong thread
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
It is usually state and city officials jobs to monitor local infrastructure and maintain stuff like the water system. And it has been shown that Michigan that state and local officials are incompetent to the point that of being criminal.
Obama requested funding for an infrastructure program that could have provide funds to address stuff like this nationwide, but he was rebuffed by Congress.
Last edited:
aepps20
Supporter
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,563
- 90,838
The obvious answer is of course Obummer was a failure and ruined everything. The more hidden answer is the issue is an issue that the states need to address which they didn't.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,416
- 195,842
Trump would perjure himself within seconds talking to Mueller
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
If you work for the federal government and voted for the Orange Bigot, congrats, you played yourself.
And remember:
-The federal government is the new of the largest suppliers of middle class jobs
-Our deficit issue is caused by Trump's tax cuts which mainly help the richest of the rich.
Trump is ******* trash.
- Jun 21, 2005
- 10,003
- 11,462
Heard this question on MSNBC yesterday and wanted to ask, if Abrams or Gillum win as black candidates with progressive platforms in the deep South, will that change the Dems 2020 plans?
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
Sorry, but what Dems plans?
It you are referring to a national strategy, then that hinges on who the noninee is.
It you are referring to a national strategy, then that hinges on who the noninee is.
Similar threads
