- 783
- 10
lol .. ksteezy .. once again you failed to hit the object .. so you are saying the PP was that made the picture .. incorrect my dude .. beside the stuff thatyou mentioned .. the lighting the soft shadows (fill light) the makeup the hair style the jewels is what make the picture .. the PP was just to make thepicture that much better ..
you come in here and post on how many people are giving you praises and asking for your help on pm in the last two weeks .. good for you .. I don't bragabout none of that because it doesn't do anything but for me and as far as I know if they are hitting you up is because of your PP - I don't think ishard to go in LR or PS and hit a couple of preset modes to get vintage - sephia - aged - etc etc etc look .. so don't come in here with all that none sense..
I took your criticism just as that an opinion .. not one that matter much but its whatever .. it actually made me laugh ..
When was the last time you saw a Vogue or Time with un-edited pictures .. further more when was the last time you seen a Prada - Gucci - Liz - Guess or any adwith unedited picture .. did all of the photographers for those did the edit .. highly questionable .. does that not make them theirs? lol .. you are wrong ..don't come in here preaching like you the next Savior because you aren't .. honestly you are much like me an armature . none of your picture stand outand none IMHO are worth any money compensation .. but that's just me ..
Lastly - lots of MODEL (not a chick that I meet in the street but girls) like Naomi - Tyra - Hady - Cindy and I can go on and even actress singers etc havenatural shoots .. to an extend they get some contouring slimming blemish removals etc etc - so if we apply your theory .. they aren't them and is a falserepresentation right?
Come on my dude ...
you come in here and post on how many people are giving you praises and asking for your help on pm in the last two weeks .. good for you .. I don't bragabout none of that because it doesn't do anything but for me and as far as I know if they are hitting you up is because of your PP - I don't think ishard to go in LR or PS and hit a couple of preset modes to get vintage - sephia - aged - etc etc etc look .. so don't come in here with all that none sense..
I took your criticism just as that an opinion .. not one that matter much but its whatever .. it actually made me laugh ..
When was the last time you saw a Vogue or Time with un-edited pictures .. further more when was the last time you seen a Prada - Gucci - Liz - Guess or any adwith unedited picture .. did all of the photographers for those did the edit .. highly questionable .. does that not make them theirs? lol .. you are wrong ..don't come in here preaching like you the next Savior because you aren't .. honestly you are much like me an armature . none of your picture stand outand none IMHO are worth any money compensation .. but that's just me ..
Lastly - lots of MODEL (not a chick that I meet in the street but girls) like Naomi - Tyra - Hady - Cindy and I can go on and even actress singers etc havenatural shoots .. to an extend they get some contouring slimming blemish removals etc etc - so if we apply your theory .. they aren't them and is a falserepresentation right?
Come on my dude ...