mr niketalk sr
Banned
- 607
- 10
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2010
id say those are fake, cause the swoosh should look like it was graffitied on, not so perfect like that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
WallyHopp wrote:
I'm not surprised though, Tinker's shoe flops in 2004 with a price point of only $110. So fresh minds get involved in 2009 and Avar designs Nikes "first rebirth" shoe ignoring the model 5 years prior. This time, no dual zoom, no shank plates, no seamless upper, and now some cool shiny synthetic material. Avar claims the forefoot is better with nothing as it'll be more flexible or "free".... And now in 2010, he's proclaiming the zoom setup in the kobe VI's as ideal... I just don't get it.
i don't understand... the v's and the vi's both have the same zoom setup, do they not?
Did you line up at HOH?Originally Posted by alsasam
Really sorry bout that guys.. Definitely not trying to get this locked.. Mods i consider myself warned.. Just dying for this shoe and after the BS Niketown Miami pulled on me.. Just so damn frustrating..
i don't understand... the v's and the vi's both have the same zoom setup, do they not?Originally Posted by al3x89
WallyHopp wrote:
I'm not surprised though, Tinker's shoe flops in 2004 with a price point of only $110. So fresh minds get involved in 2009 and Avar designs Nikes "first rebirth" shoe ignoring the model 5 years prior. This time, no dual zoom, no shank plates, no seamless upper, and now some cool shiny synthetic material. Avar claims the forefoot is better with nothing as it'll be more flexible or "free".... And now in 2010, he's proclaiming the zoom setup in the kobe VI's as ideal... I just don't get it.
Thanks for the info.Originally Posted by gambino54
Not sure if this is posted, but release dates:
Concords: 1/15/11 Kobe VI White/Black/Concord 429659-100, $130
Chaos: 1/25/11 Zoom Kobe VI, Dark Grey/Metallic Silver,Glass Blue 429659-005, $130
Breds: 2/05/11 Zoom Kobe VI Black/White Varsity Red $130 429659-001
LA's???? 3/05/11 Zoom Kobe VI Varsity Royal/White-Black $130 429659-400
Originally Posted by Ferrari6888
He asked a simple question. You should be safe with either a 9.5 or 10. I don't own the CG's, but I have found that I can wear either a 10.5 or 11 in the Kobe's. A 10.5 is a little snug at first, but once you break them in, they feel perfect. The 11 fits perfect out of the box and don't stretch.Originally Posted by blacklion23
Originally Posted by oODeZzY
If im a 9.5 in the cool greys should i cop a 10 or 9.5?
Go back to Jordan Brand where the quality sucks and the prices are stupid.
Originally Posted by Ferrari6888
i don't understand... the v's and the vi's both have the same zoom setup, do they not?Originally Posted by al3x89
WallyHopp wrote:
I'm not surprised though, Tinker's shoe flops in 2004 with a price point of only $110. So fresh minds get involved in 2009 and Avar designs Nikes "first rebirth" shoe ignoring the model 5 years prior. This time, no dual zoom, no shank plates, no seamless upper, and now some cool shiny synthetic material. Avar claims the forefoot is better with nothing as it'll be more flexible or "free".... And now in 2010, he's proclaiming the zoom setup in the kobe VI's as ideal... I just don't get it.
If you are a 9.5 in the 2010 Cool Greys you are a 9.5 in the Kobes. The cool greys run a little on the tight side just like the Kobes. I am a 12 in both the 2010 Cool Grey and the Kobe line.Originally Posted by oODeZzY
If im a 9.5 in the cool greys should i cop a 10 or 9.5?