Hmmm... It really depends on what you're doing with them. I mean if you run 200-300mi/month, of course, the shoe'll wear down no matter the tech (Boost may be something else though). Aesthetically, atop a Flyknit, IMO, the LR sole looks much much cleaner than the Zoom soles. However, since we're talking performance/durability, my current running rotation has the Flyknit Racer (~250mi) and the other Flyknits (F1 (~100mi), F2 (~50mi), og Free (~100mi)) and Lunaracers (different pairs ~200mi), and I've run in a handful of Zoom techs in the past, so I've pretty much experienced what each tech has to offer. I'll admit the newer Lunar tech (LG4-6 and Flyknit Lunar 1) "bottoms out" much quicker than their predecessors. I've run well over 1,000mi in the original LunarEclipse, ~500mi in the original Lunartrainer and ~500mi in the Lunaracer (sole pictured in the photoshop) . Though the LR sole is featured on a handful of NSW models that are primarily worn for casual purposes, performance-wise, I consider them one of Nike's best soles (if not, the best) because they DO and CAN last as long as Zoom.
not even close
