- May 15, 2003
- 56,657
- 65,604
Same thing I said about the Jordan VII'sOriginally Posted by WallyHopp
I can type for days on this but to get to my point. Back in '05, i bought three new models of nike trainers. all featured different price points but they all had great quality leathers. maybe I was spoiled early on to expect this sort of thing. I mean, a $80 dollar shoe with real suedes and leathers? get out of here.. Maybe Nike set themselves up for failure.Originally Posted by NobleKane
yea.... plus u have to take into account shoes made back in the day the technology is way inferior to todays nike shoes.
both pairs of my air trainer max 91 retros, which came out after the sc originally, retailed at $90 each....and this shoe is 105?
Just last summer Nike decides to retro one of these shoes and lower the price point, from $110 to $80. With this came material quality changes and construction changes. You saw the real degradation from each model and you accepted it knowing the differences.
i guess its not apples to apples here when you apply this to other models out there. let's just say, im glad NIKE is being called out here. It doesn't make sense what is happening here. A new model can come out at $110, get retroed at $80, yet here we are still fighting with a $105 price point featuring materials worse than shoes that retailed for $80?
Nike, you disappoint me.
btw there are some photos of the beets and raiders on ebay right now.. quality looks like these.. easy pass
OG - $125
Retro in 2004 - $135
CDP for two pair - $310/$155 each
For cheaper quality