- 93
- 10
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2009
Wally thanks for digging that picture up of the size tag. Thought i had look threw all the pages. Will be finding a way to get mine tomorrow.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by WallyHopp
4-5 little things really do add up...
plastic like layer on the midfoot straps- gone
thicker black threads on the midfoot straps- not there
padded ankle collar perforated leather- shouldn't be there
grey mudguard- not quite the right shade
concord leather stripe not nubuck- it's leather instead
add all that up and its not an entirely eye popping nike flagship release, instead its just like the rest... It truly could've been the end all of nike retros, a true shoe for the decades.
saddening to see.
heres your perfect eye popping shoe that has everything coming together PERFECTLY:
a true orange glow..
PERFECTION done by you NIKE. its not like you're trying to copy what reebok did and don't know the formula. bottomline, you are CHEAP yet still charge $105 for a non performance shoe?
Man I dont care if they are $305 I am still coppin at least 3 pairs. I know i know, thats why Nike gets away with it....I dont care, I love thisshoe.Originally Posted by NobleKane
i dont get how these are $105 lol both my trainer max 91's were 90 bucks a piece...and this bo jackson was BEFORE those... oh and the air trainer max 91>>>>>>>>>>>>these as far as comfort
Originally Posted by casekicks
I need these so bad..but I know I aint gonna be able to get em cause I gotta buy my stupid wife an anniversary present..
still wont be hard to obtain here in NYC. But why would there be pics of them on footlocker unlocked?Originally Posted by UNIQUEKICKZ
Just confirmd that FA nor FL will NOT be getting these!!!check ur local mom and pop shops.....
Ducktales.Originally Posted by UNIQUEKICKZ
Just confirmd that FA nor FL will NOT be getting these!!!
I've noticed all of the trainers are shorter than the OG'sOriginally Posted by WallyHopp
bknowbles, brett favre your 98s ASAP
I forget who I was talking to with this about, but even the 98 retros, the true inception RETRO model, was wrongly built. The originals are a good 1 inch higher in the ankle collar area compared to the 1998-2009 retro models. Throw in a tongue that peaked through the upper a good inch to inch and a half, and the OGs are truly "TRAINER SC HIGHs"..
All retro models from 98 to now, are a good 2 inches shorter than they should be.
A sad fact to be known at a time like this