OFFICIAL NFL Discussion Thread: 2015-16 Season - Congrats to the Denver Broncos and their fans! SB 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
Fairley to the Pats?


has he done anything worth mentioning since Auburn?


i honestly didnt even know he was on the rams, i wonder if him and Long have any good chemistry together 


Well he's not really gonna be expected to be a starter if he does sign :lol . Just an extra big body for the rotation now that Siliga is in Seattle so it would probably be a low risk high reward type of deal

whatever happened to the kid from florida they drafted that had injury concerns ?

Big Easley?

He was seriously looking like the best pass rusher on the team right up there with Sheard and Chandler before being shut down late in the season so he's coming along. His jump off the snap is ridiculous :x. He's gonna need to step up even more next season though to help replace Chandler
 
Last edited:
@clarencehilljr: Cowboys closer to getting deal done with Patrick Robinson than Alfred Morris per source
 
@MatthewFairburn: Percy Harvin is still mulling his football future, but Doug Whaley is of the understanding that the Bills are still in play.
 
Speaking of...did Welker retire yet or is he gonna back in LA next season?
 
Last edited:
I think it was a one year deal, he's def finished IMO

He had 13 receptions last year, that boy is gonna be sitting in dark rooms
 
My man didn't even get a ring for all his troubles :{ :{ :{

he only has himself to blame....



half srs. but regardless, wes is appreciated :hat

Terrible ball placement from the Deflator :{

welker.gif
 
Last edited:
My man didn't even get a ring for all his troubles :{ :{ :{

he only has himself to blame....



half srs. but regardless, wes is appreciated :hat

Terrible ball placement from the Deflator :{

welker.gif

yeah...terrible ball that hit the receiver square in both hands :{

pass could have been better for sure, but square in both hands. not finger tips. square.

He may have put a little too much

*glasses*













air under it
 
that would mean the bike would have lights and reflectors. didn't you say he didn't have those?
 
I'm surprised the Bills would even want Percy. Wasn't he healthy last year and just decided he didn't want to play anymore?
 
Really thought the Jets had gotten him for a steal and it was a failure :lol .
 
[h1]NFL will tell officials not to shy away from ejecting players[/h1]


 

The NFL is expected to pass a new rule this week that will result in an automatic ejection for two unsportsmanlike conduct fouls. But the league’s emphasis on ejections will go beyond that.

NFL V.P. of Officiating Dean Blandino told Peter King of TheMMQB.com that the league will also remind officials that it’s in their power to eject players for flagrant rules violations, even if they don’t commit two unsportsmanlike conduct penalties.

“We will reaffirm that the rulebook does allow us some discretion when it comes to ejection,” Blandino said. “We’ll make sure they understand that they have that power and they shouldn’t shy away when it is necessary.”

The new two-strikes rule wouldn’t have resulted in Giants receiver Odell Beckham Jr. being ejected for his actions against Panthers cornerback Josh Norman, but Blandino said the officials should have ejected Beckham in that game anyway.

“I think everybody agreed that that was flagrant enough to eject. And that was the message to the game officials as part of the teaching and training after the fact,” Blandino said.

So new rule or no new rule, the officials will be told in 2016 that they’re empowered to throw a player out of the game.

:rolleyes
[QUOTE url="[URL]http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/6660/richard-sherman[/URL]"]
[h1]Richard Sherman: Goodell’s “foolish” ejection rule shows he doesn’t understand players[/h1]


 

Seahawks cornerback Richard Sherman doesn’t think much of NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell’s desire to eject players who get two unsportsmanlike conduct penalties in a game.

Asked about the proposal on ESPN, Sherman said it shows how little Goodell understands about the players who are on the field on Sundays.

“I think it’s foolish, but it sounds like something somebody who’s never played the game would say, something they would suggest, because he doesn’t understand, he’s just a face, he’s just a suit. He’s never set foot on the field and understood how you can get a personal foul,” Sherman said.

Sherman echoed that when asked why the NFL hasn’t been able to figure out a way to fix the catch rule.

"Because you've got a bunch of suits doing it," Sherman said. "Like I said before, you don't have a bunch of guys ... let Jerry Rice and Michael Irvin talk about it for about 20, 30 minutes. Maybe Cris Carter. Randy Moss, let those guys have a roundtable discussion about what a catch should be and come up with a rule.

"I guarantee you it'd be more effective than the rule they have now because those are the pass-catchers. Those are some of the best pass-catchers we've had. I think it'd be more straightforward and to the point. You've got a bunch of guys who have never played. They've probably touched a football to hold it out or to shake somebody's hand, to take a picture, but they've never played the game."

Sherman’s opinion of Goodell is a common one among players. But the ejection rule is likely to be imposed upon the players whether Sherman likes it or not.

Sherm :hat  
[/quote]

Rebel Sherman back at it. :hat

And people will say "because you didn't that doesn't mean you don't know the game"

What Sherman is saying all these rules are putting players in impossible positions. They don't even have a real definition for what an illegal hit is, or whats roughing the passer, or what a catch is. The "rules" are so inconsistent now. That's why people look at the NFL heads like they're geeks in a suit.
 
Rebel Sherman back at it. :hat

And people will say "because you didn't that doesn't mean you don't know the game"

What Sherman is saying all these rules are putting players in impossible positions. They don't even have a real definition for what an illegal hit is, or whats roughing the passer, or what a catch is. The "rules" are so inconsistent now. That's why people look at the NFL heads like they're geeks in a suit.

Exactly...can't hit a guy high...can't hit a guy low...and even if I hit him legally and it LOOKS bad I get flagged :{ . Now they are gonna add an automatic ejection when guys aren't sure how they can legally hit a guy? The rules are being tipped way too far in favor of the offenses
 
that would mean the bike would have lights and reflectors. didn't you say he didn't have those?

There's still dirtbikes with headlights :lol other dirtbikes come with headlights as well. So your argument is invalid
 
 
that would mean the bike would have lights and reflectors. didn't you say he didn't have those?
There's still dirtbikes with headlights
laugh.gif
other dirtbikes come with headlights as well. So your argument is invalid
so his bike had lights? cause you said he wasnt using it and he wouldnt use his headlights in car. just seems like a lot of assuming. you can have it tho..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom