- 30,498
- 5,958
Don't know how I feel about this.
Official NBA OFF-SEASON Thread - 2011: Free Agency Dec. 9th
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Bert.,
- Start date
- 20,361
- 18,541
Yep. Though his legs are brittle, he's still 7'0 250 lbs, and when a smidge healthy he's a effective.
Good trade Kings/Cavs. The SF slot in Cleveland was a revolving door last season. OC had a sophmore slump last season, but I haven't lost faith in his talents.
- 20,361
- 18,541
Yep. Though his legs are brittle, he's still 7'0 250 lbs, and when a smidge healthy he's a effective.
Good trade Kings/Cavs. The SF slot in Cleveland was a revolving door last season. OC had a sophmore slump last season, but I haven't lost faith in his talents.
- 30,498
- 5,958
So according to the Cavs.... Omri > Amare ?
SMH.
SMH.
- 30,498
- 5,958
So according to the Cavs.... Omri > Amare ?
SMH.
SMH.
- 92,107
- 127,448
- 92,107
- 127,448
- 29,630
- 1,863
i don't like that for the cavs
- 29,630
- 1,863
i don't like that for the cavs
- 6,201
- 606
The Cavs must really be banking on Thompson. The Kings are looking like a good 2K team to run with now.
- 6,201
- 606
The Cavs must really be banking on Thompson. The Kings are looking like a good 2K team to run with now.
I LOVE that deal for the Cavs. Kings will suck anyways, now the Cavs could have 2 top end picks again (depending on the Kings pick being lottery protected and all that)
2 top 5 picks this year, maybe 2 more top 5-7ish type picks next year, and move forward from there.
Kings, eh. They get a little more size, another talent I suppose, but they have a serious group of guys that need the ball now. Be interesting to see what happens when they realize there's only one ball on the court at a time.
2 top 5 picks this year, maybe 2 more top 5-7ish type picks next year, and move forward from there.
Kings, eh. They get a little more size, another talent I suppose, but they have a serious group of guys that need the ball now. Be interesting to see what happens when they realize there's only one ball on the court at a time.
I LOVE that deal for the Cavs. Kings will suck anyways, now the Cavs could have 2 top end picks again (depending on the Kings pick being lottery protected and all that)
2 top 5 picks this year, maybe 2 more top 5-7ish type picks next year, and move forward from there.
Kings, eh. They get a little more size, another talent I suppose, but they have a serious group of guys that need the ball now. Be interesting to see what happens when they realize there's only one ball on the court at a time.
2 top 5 picks this year, maybe 2 more top 5-7ish type picks next year, and move forward from there.
Kings, eh. They get a little more size, another talent I suppose, but they have a serious group of guys that need the ball now. Be interesting to see what happens when they realize there's only one ball on the court at a time.
- 10,371
- 653
Banking on him to at least be as good as J.J. Hickson? That's not really any kind of far-fetched.
If that pick is for next year, there's a great chance that whoever they select with it (or combine with their own pick to trade up and get) will be better than Hickson, too.
And Casspi is like 24, can score and will help spread the floor for Irving.
People are going to act like the Cavs got hosed because Hickson was supposedly the roadblock for Amare, but things change, and in all reality, the trade is fine.
If that pick is for next year, there's a great chance that whoever they select with it (or combine with their own pick to trade up and get) will be better than Hickson, too.
And Casspi is like 24, can score and will help spread the floor for Irving.
People are going to act like the Cavs got hosed because Hickson was supposedly the roadblock for Amare, but things change, and in all reality, the trade is fine.
- 94,396
- 33,451
not a bad deal for the Cavs.
- 94,396
- 33,451
not a bad deal for the Cavs.
- 10,371
- 653
Banking on him to at least be as good as J.J. Hickson? That's not really any kind of far-fetched.
If that pick is for next year, there's a great chance that whoever they select with it (or combine with their own pick to trade up and get) will be better than Hickson, too.
And Casspi is like 24, can score and will help spread the floor for Irving.
People are going to act like the Cavs got hosed because Hickson was supposedly the roadblock for Amare, but things change, and in all reality, the trade is fine.
If that pick is for next year, there's a great chance that whoever they select with it (or combine with their own pick to trade up and get) will be better than Hickson, too.
And Casspi is like 24, can score and will help spread the floor for Irving.
People are going to act like the Cavs got hosed because Hickson was supposedly the roadblock for Amare, but things change, and in all reality, the trade is fine.
- 2,573
- 10
I guess some of you will forever believe Amare was on the table for Hickson. Which is cool, because I don't think there's proof either way, but I
Anywho, I'm out before someone comes with "well, LeBron chose Jamison over Amare anyway"
Oh and the draft pick is lottery protected until 2014
- 2,573
- 10
I guess some of you will forever believe Amare was on the table for Hickson. Which is cool, because I don't think there's proof either way, but I
Anywho, I'm out before someone comes with "well, LeBron chose Jamison over Amare anyway"
Oh and the draft pick is lottery protected until 2014
- 30,498
- 5,958
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
I guess some of you will forever believe Amare was on the table for Hickson. Which is cool, because I don't think there's proof either way, but Iat that ever being on the table.
Anywho, I'm out before someone comes with "well, LeBron chose Jamison over Amare anyway"
Oh and the draft pick is lottery protected until 2014
Hopefully this helps us.
- 30,498
- 5,958
Originally Posted by ex carrabba fan
I guess some of you will forever believe Amare was on the table for Hickson. Which is cool, because I don't think there's proof either way, but Iat that ever being on the table.
Anywho, I'm out before someone comes with "well, LeBron chose Jamison over Amare anyway"
Oh and the draft pick is lottery protected until 2014
Hopefully this helps us.
- 94,396
- 33,451
during a lockout are teams able to make trades?
- 94,396
- 33,451
during a lockout are teams able to make trades?
- 25,273
- 13,330
On Oden... The Blazers had to do it. Who else are they gonna go sign with no cap space? You've gotta take the chance and a one-year, $8.8M contract is not a bad gamble.
- 25,273
- 13,330
On Oden... The Blazers had to do it. Who else are they gonna go sign with no cap space? You've gotta take the chance and a one-year, $8.8M contract is not a bad gamble.
