antidope
Supporter
- 63,305
- 67,440
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2012
The fact that you think that I left out "So many names" furthers my point that the term superstar is used too loosely. People are out there throwing out 8+ names. Really? Come one lets be serious, thats overuse of the term. You're including too many people and all that does is open up the door for one more person to get in who replicates that persons production. CP3s production can be replicated by Deron Williams, TPs production can be replicated by Stephs, Monta Ellis replicates what Melo does, and so on. Superstars are the two players in the league who produce at such a high level that no one else can replicate it right now. That is LeBron and Durant.LMAO Your HILARIOUS. The fact that you left out SO MANY NAMES, is just funny.LeBron and Durant. Thats it, that is where the line ends.
IF YOU ARE WHAT YOU SAY YOU AREEEE A SUPERSTARRRRRRRRR HAVE NO FEARRR.....
They arent superstars currently, and thats not a knock on them. I feel like people are taking the fact that people arent being labeled superstars as a knock on them. Its not, all the players you named are fantastic players and are good for great performances every night. But theres a difference between going out there and putting up an 8 game, than the two guys who are out there putting up 10 games every single night.I'm looking at the entire picture. If guys like Dirk/Duncan aren't considered superstars in the league after ALL that they've accomplished (and are still contributing at a high level), then I dunno what to tell you.Those are all stars. Those aren't all superstars
What's the difference between a "superstar" moniker and "all-star" in looking at the players that I named?
Kobe is no longer a superstar. Was he? Yes.LeBron and Durant. Thats it, that is where the line ends.
So kobe is not a superstar? Hahaahahahahahahahhaahahahahahahaha I'm done
Last edited: