- Mar 8, 2010
- 21,800
- 3,553
Too much.Try to stay away from my posts, Dipset.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Too much.Try to stay away from my posts, Dipset.
Try to stay away from my posts, Dipset.
Did anyone ask him about that shot after the game? That feels like something I would want to see.
Did anyone ask him about that shot after the game? That feels like something I would want to see.
proof that the lockout didnt help these small market teams. They are truly the ones that cannot afford to be over the cap so it limits them more - while teams like the Lakers and Knicks can keep spending all day and still be oK. Take that small market whining *** punks.
OKC couldnt afford Harden
Grizzlies couldnt afford Gay
Both basically are saying we dont mind not winning if we can save - whie LA says "give me more players please"
proof that the lockout didnt help these small market teams. They are truly the ones that cannot afford to be over the cap so it limits them more - while teams like the Lakers and Knicks can keep spending all day and still be oK. Take that small market whining *** punks.
OKC couldnt afford Harden
Grizzlies couldnt afford Gay
Both basically are saying we dont mind not winning if we can save - whie LA says "give me more players please"
Did anyone ask him about that shot after the game? That feels like something I would want to see.
I think it was "pal" but yeah...that was classic."You're next buddy"Try to stay away from my posts, Dipset.
proof that the lockout didnt help these small market teams. They are truly the ones that cannot afford to be over the cap so it limits them more - while teams like the Lakers and Knicks can keep spending all day and still be oK. Take that small market whining *** punks.
OKC couldnt afford Harden
Grizzlies couldnt afford Gay
Both basically are saying we dont mind not winning if we can save - whie LA says "give me more players please"
yea i was talking about winning but very true - it gives the small market owners more money. bastards like Dan Gilbert complains about the lakers getting CP3 but the Lakers are basically putting money in his pockets since his team licks scrotal tissueThe lockout did help small market teams, they helped the owners get a bigger piece of the shared revenue that the Lakers, Nets, and Knicks are paying in penalties for being over the cap - "Luxury Tax". Small Market owners wanted the money, they never cared about winning , OKC and Memphis proved that. That at least is for certain.
Knicks havent won not because they couldnt get players but because your management are a bunch of bafoons that don't know anything about creating a team. The knicks could "afford" Lin, they just didnt want to for that price.The Knicks haven't won in like 50 years. People need to stop lumping us in as the cause of large market supremacy.
And technically it made us give up Lin who went to Houston. Who also shouldn't be a small market team lol
But everyone here wa saying the CBA had nothing to do with "parity".
Parity is just something owners throw out there to get fans on their side
proof that the lockout didnt help these small market teams. They are truly the ones that cannot afford to be over the cap so it limits them more - while teams like the Lakers and Knicks can keep spending all day and still be oK. Take that small market whining *** punks.
OKC couldnt afford Harden
Grizzlies couldnt afford Gay
Both basically are saying we dont mind not winning if we can save - whie LA says "give me more players please"
The Knicks haven't won in like 50 years. People need to stop lumping us in as the cause of large market supremacy.
And technically it made us give up Lin who went to Houston. Who also shouldn't be a small market team lol
But everyone here wa saying the CBA had nothing to do with "parity".
Parity is just something owners throw out there to get fans on their side
yea obviously teams are not gonna want to end up paying millions extra if what they have on the floor is struggling so much it wouldnt make a difference. Even if the team can "afford" it.Weren't the Lakers thinking of making moves earlier in the season to avoid the super tax or whatever its called?
Small market teams are ruining the NBA for realyea obviously teams are not gonna want to end up paying millions extra if what they have on the floor is struggling so much it wouldnt make a difference. Even if the team can "afford" it.Weren't the Lakers thinking of making moves earlier in the season to avoid the super tax or whatever its called?
Still, the lakers could have amnestied gasol or MWP but didnt becuase they wanted one more run out of this team. Something that small market owners dont really care about now that they just cannot afford it.