- Jan 26, 2015
- 57
- 23
I would say true to size to possibly needing to go half a size up. I'm normally a 10 and rarely ever have to buy a different size but with my 1.5 chicagos I almost wish I had gotten a pair of 10.5s.
Official Jordan 1.5
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by iriesupreme,
- Start date
- Mar 24, 2014
- 2,924
- 914
did the soar blue came out? saw them at bunch of legit seller here and there... been waiting for them to hit ndc.
Last edited:
- Apr 13, 2013
- 2,599
- 801
I think 10/17
- May 15, 2003
- 56,657
- 65,604
I'm tempted by the 1.5 royals.
- Aug 11, 2001
- 5,790
- 3,038
Off topic but a near FSR of Chi 1.5's are available locally for $100.00...
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,635
- 9,694
Great price, there's a 14 local that I'm waiting to hit that low
- Jul 27, 2015
- 309
- 118
Will be cheaper from a reseller.
- Jul 27, 2015
- 309
- 118
It's funny resellers are discounting the blues before they even released.
- Jun 25, 2014
- 87
- 14
The shoes are set to be released on October 17. How can it be that ppl already selling it on eBay??
- Jan 22, 2014
- 497
- 214
They're in some stores already
- Apr 13, 2013
- 2,599
- 801
What store?
- Aug 11, 2001
- 5,790
- 3,038
Mom & Pop
- Dec 4, 2012
- 4,804
- 2,175
Need to see in person, saw the Royals being kinda light
- Aug 16, 2012
- 1,159
- 852
Bought the soars under retail from 23penny and they got here a little early. The soar blue is quite a bit lighter than royal or sport blue, but i like them. I haven't worn these yet, but i assume they are just as comfy as the chicago version (which is a pretty practical all day shoe), and they don't look banana-ish on foot.
- Dec 24, 2012
- 411
- 307
Shoes look great. Based on the Chicagos, can you tell me if sizing is pretty consistent with og 1's?
- Apr 13, 2013
- 2,599
- 801
Could you do a side by side pic of the soars and chicagos? I'm curious if the banana toe was fixed by changing the shape or if it's just less noticeable because of the cw.
- Oct 15, 2013
- 1,678
- 821
I heard the bulky toe on the 1.5 is just a optical illusion it's not that bulky but the sole makes it look like it
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,427
- 39,199
Wrong. The toe box on the 1 Return is different.
- Aug 16, 2012
- 1,159
- 852
I wear the same size in both OG and the 1.5s, although the toe box in the 1.5s feels a little roomier side to side to me. i could try to do some 2015 Chicago 1s vs 1.5 Chicagos if you think that would help your decision.
Here are some more pics, let me know if you have other angles you want. To me, the soars seem to curve a little less upward at the front, and keep in mind that in these pics i have those cheapo ikea shoe trees in the chicagos, so the banana effect may be slightly less than stock due to those as well. The soars still have the stock cardboard trees in them for reference. Both are size 11.5. i tried to align everything as best i could for these, i think they represent what i am seeing in person pretty well.
- Dec 10, 2014
- 129
- 34
Looks identical to me.
- Apr 30, 2002
- 7,635
- 9,694
no noticeable difference to me either.
- Feb 29, 2000
- 88,762
- 47,972
Would you say the cushioning on the 1.5 is better than the og 1 retro?
- Aug 4, 2005
- 1,011
- 202
I actually saw the Chi's in person and not too shabby i must say.
Those soar blues are really will try an scoop a pair if possible.
Those soar blues are really will try an scoop a pair if possible.
- Nov 10, 2013
- 1,807
- 842
I tried on the chi 1.5 in store, the comfort was bananas. super cushy compared to regular 1's.
- Apr 2, 2014
- 11,820
- 26,094
Absolutely. Even better than the remastered 1s. Just posted on the UNC 1 thread about this same topic. Was thinking of passing on the Reverse Frag 1.5s because I love my UNCs, but the comfort of the 1.5's footbed makes them well worth it. Even thinking of copping the gum soles on the low 'cuz they're so damn comfortable.
