- 56,592
- 65,517
The banana shape is throwing me off. I might go and look at them in person though.
Official Jordan 1.5
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by iriesupreme,
- Start date
- 3,094
- 468
Your point? Idc if Jordan wore them before or the history of it. Sole is still ugly
The Fresh Prince
formerly airsakuragi
- 13,542
- 9,590
The shoe is not bad it's just the toe area where people get turned off. The Midsole is suppose to be that way, that's what differentiates this from the Chicago 1s. Seen from the picture that the leather was mediocre at the most but still decent. Since it this release was so close to the Chicago 1 release and have the Chicago colorway, it comes off as an insult to people who missed out on the Chicago 1s.
- 88,755
- 47,964
Wonder if these have full length air if they are using the 2 midsole
- 88,755
- 47,964
But on the real instead of making more chicago 1's to meet demand they make these instead.
Let that sink in
Let that sink in
- 56,592
- 65,517
But on the real instead of making more chicago 1's to meet demand they make these instead.
Let that sink in
I think about that every time Nike or JB creates a Jordan mid or dunk in a Jordan I colorway right after
- 267
- 237
NT seems to be in a bubble on this one. These will sell out before 2pm and that's after dudes are on the splash screen half the morning. Anyone who just jumped on the OG Jordan 1 train will be sure to cop these as consolation prize for years of neglecting them. Hypebeasts gonna buy regardless of toe shape, width, etc. These look like 1's and JB knows what they are doing. Don't sleep and put in some work if you like them. Don't let 11 pages fool you, it has happened before.
- 3,587
- 1,299
did 2 raffles. missed out on the chi 1s and sbb. i guess this is not a bad consolation?
- 267
- 237
I really like them and def gonna grab a pair or 2. IMO these are pretty dope. Might even see people wearing them instead of stocking them in the closet for years.
- 33,427
- 39,199
Did u try them on? If so, are they true to size?
- 33,427
- 39,199
Why would it be an insult? I missed out and I don't feel that way. In fact, the Chicago 1 colorway was my first Air Jordan in 1985. I'm just as excited about this release. I will also grab the Chicago 1's later in the year.
- 33,427
- 39,199
But on the real instead of making more chicago 1's to meet demand they make these instead.
Let that sink in
It's the 30th anniversary of Jordan Brand. There is a REASON these are releasing and in a Nike Air box too. Let that sink in.
- 33,427
- 39,199
These will sell better than people think.
- 44,214
- 2,544
Yall really copping these? They'll sit.
- 33,427
- 39,199
YES! If they sit, I will cop a second pair on discount. I doubt they will get that far though.
- 88,755
- 47,964
Well then you are the type of person nike looks for when selling shoes.
Its an ok shoe. It doesnt need four straight posts of you defending it and hyping it up
- 33,427
- 39,199
Thanks for telling me what Nike looks for.
You tried making fun of the shoe, trying to be slick, and there is a very good reason for the release.
I don't need to defend it or hype it up. I post what I want and buy what I want regardless of the negativity here. So be it if you don't like my consecutive posts.
Last edited:
- 33,427
- 39,199
The funny thing is, if MJ wore these the majority of the time instead of the 1s, people would be making fun of the other shoes as being variant. Back in '85 people called the 1's clown shoes too. Some of you are a joke here.
Last edited:
- 688
- 739
Uhh I've seen 85 1s in person and I've seen these in person 1.5s while looking good look like a clown shoe 85 1s look pretty swell if I do say so myself [emoji]128526[/emoji][emoji]128526[/emoji]
- 379
- 462
No consolation prize for me. I grabbed the Chicagos and these are calling my name too!
- 33,427
- 39,199
- 997
- 526
I hope some more brave soles snap some on feet pics of these come saturday. There's like 2 on feet pics of these on the internet...and 1 is of MJ
- 33,427
- 39,199
- 3,031
- 549
Prolly wont look that bad if you dont tuck your pants in.... lmao waiting for pics.... they are def on the copp list for now....
- 88,755
- 47,964
Thanks for telling me what Nike looks for.
You tried making fun of the shoe, trying to be slick.
By stating the obvious that they could have made more chicago 1's instead of these? Thats making fun of the shoe?
Sounds more like your a bit too sensitive?
Or you work for nike doing overtime trying hard to sell these to people? lol
Either way your last few posts have been awful so bye bye
