swendro
formerly swendro88
- Aug 1, 2005
- 13,038
- 9,419
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In definitely going to being buying garages.. I absolutely hate losing most of my cars in GTA 4.. Because I had no place to park them..
This.
I make it a point to collect as many rare/super cars in the game as possible...
Been doing so since San Andreas. Those garages come in handy...
I know that feel. I remember at the end of Vice City when you get the mansion with the 2 car garage I would pack it with like 3, 4 cars and motorcycles. I was always blown going back and seeing all my cars gone.In definitely going to being buying garages.. I absolutely hate losing most of my cars in GTA 4.. Because I had no place to park them..
Word I'd be willing to spend extra GTA dollars on insurance if cars in your garage respawn.Yeah I customized a whole bunch of cars, filling each garage with cars. Then when I got out to the dessert airstrip and realized I could park cars in the Giant 747 hangar I was likeI can fit whole fleet of cars in this thing! But you could only put like 4 in there.
I think that they should make it so if you park a car in a garage, that car re-spawns there every time until you park a new car in there. It's fun customizing cars, but honestly cars barely last me 5 minutes most of the time. Spend more time customizing cars than driving them.
I actually wouldn't mind this. If they could do something like Red Dead, then why not that?Forget Red Dead. R* needs to do a medieval world. Ala Game of Thrones. That would be
Forget Red Dead. R* needs to do a medieval world. Ala Game of Thrones. That would be
I actually wouldn't mind this. If they could do something like Red Dead, then why not that?
Just to make this clear, so those are all ps3/xbox screens?
I don't want to hear about any non-GTA R* game not named the warriors. That #%*+ was streets of rage on steroids.
Atmosphere.Still don't understand why so many people think that Vice City > San Andreas. I guess I can somewhat understand if it's only about the story/mission part of the game. But as a whole game Vice City isn't even close. The whole map in Vice City is like a mere suburb in San Andreas. You can't even kick it and have fun with your bike, you can drive at full speed for like a half a second before you slam into a car. The only part where you can go mad is the airport, just like in IV. San Andreas was a whole world where you could do all kinds of crazy stuff. And don't even get me on all the stuff you could do in San Andreas that you couldn't in Vice City where you couldn't even swim.
At the time, no it wasn't.Only thing good about VC was the music. The map was too small
At the time, no it wasn't.Only thing good about VC was the music. The map was too small
VC was a classic. Tommy Vercetti himself was a legend.
I can't hear 'I Ran' by Flock of Seagulls without thinking of Vice City.At the time, no it wasn't.Only thing good about VC was the music. The map was too smallVice City will forever be a classic game to me..VC was a classic. Tommy Vercetti himself was a legend.
I really liked the whole western theme which is probably why I liked it. Most GTA games are just urban cities so RDD was something different for me. I'll admit that game got boring faster than I thought it would, but most sandbox games are like that.I could never really get in to Red Dead completely. The game felt too slow most times. My son on the other hand loved it.