- 6,549
- 2,596
Official Green Bay Packers @ Seattle Seahawks Screw Job
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by fraij da 5 11,
- Start date
- 21,951
- 1,398
Packers line held Seahawks D-line the entire game and nothing was called, then we see those weak PI calls. :x
- 1,996
- 86
Simultaneous catches are reviewable in the endzone. Review ref is a real NFL referee.
- 20,595
- 10,604
An estimated $200 -$250 billion dollars worldwide was reversed on that final play with Sports betting.....wow
Million, dude. Not billion.
Clyde Frog
formerly jay02
- 12,617
- 7,475
As I said in a different thread I'm done playing the penalty game. I could go rewatch the game and count how many missed holding calls were on us as well. I focus on clay the most on each snap and that dude gets held non stop too. We already know the refs are bad through out so you can go back and forth with this all day like I said. But to miss two obvious penalties and make that bad of a call on the game deciding play is just brutal.
- 28,043
- 10,466
Marshawn kept it real.
At some point, both teams have to shake it off and get ready for their next opponents. Desperate 0-3 Saints for GB. Improved division rival for Seattle.
At some point, both teams have to shake it off and get ready for their next opponents. Desperate 0-3 Saints for GB. Improved division rival for Seattle.
- 4,578
- 1,636
Probably the best picture of the catch I've come across.
- 40,141
- 11,080
Probably the best picture of the catch I've come across.
4 hands on da rock
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- 107,166
- 53,366
An estimated $200 -$250 billion dollars worldwide was reversed on that final play with Sports betting.....wow
Million, dude. Not billion.
- 17,307
- 9,008
That's irrelevant. It can't be simultaneous if one man has possession first, and then the other gains possession as well..
- 11,588
- 837
An estimated $200 -$250 billion dollars worldwide was reversed on that final play with Sports betting.....wow
Million, dude. Not billion.
@ billion.
- 11,165
- 17,227
Seahawks have been involved in some of the worst officiated games in sports history. I still remember that game in '98 against the Jets and that bum Testaverde on the play that brought back instant replay.
ultralightbeam
formerly i lyricaljkilla i
- 7,953
- 1,331
They don't hear you, though.
I mean....Jennings was the first one to gain possession....then Tate gains joint possession AFTER.....not SIMULTANEOUSLY.
Like I said, NT23, they don't hear, though.
And are completely ignoring the rules.
Last edited:
- 783
- 1,405
It's getting to the point where we might put an asterisk on this entire season. Maybe that's a bit extreme but some of these phantom pass interference flags, extra yards allotted, suspect ball placement after a play, and now this? Who know's how this will affect the playoff landscape down the line. Lets say both Seattle and GB make the playoffs and Seattle has home field if these two teams meet. Every comment about the prospective playoff game will be prefaced by last night's debacle.
- 17,307
- 9,008
Not only that but also the overturned interception due to the "roughing the passer" when he was cearly outside the pocket. The only protection QBs get outside the pocket is helmet to helmet contact.
Last edited:
- 2,547
- 296
Ever since the Broncos vs. Falcons game last Monday I knew to lay off of the NFL betting. I feel like the games have been too influenced by the refs, too much damn PI and holding calls. In one point in the GB/SEA game there were 4 flags in 4 plays. :x
- 12,455
- 9,499
People still think this wasn't an INT?
Last edited:
- 12,536
- 39
I don't understand how you can justify that Seattle won.
- 30,268
- 21,727
We all know it was an INT on the replay, but in real time, with how ******g bat **** everything was, that looked like simultaneous possession. Yeah, the review may not have gotten it right, but in the heat of the moment, with how close it was, can you really be surprised the refs called it a TD? **** looked like a tie when I saw it the first time.
Also, I find it funny that the refs looked at each other, nodded in agreement, then threw up different calls
Also, I find it funny that the refs looked at each other, nodded in agreement, then threw up different calls
- 1,908
- 152
- 2,296
- 106
That was the funny part. There was literally a flag thrown after every play during the first half.
- 22,262
- 11,072
We all know it was an INT on the replay, but in real time, with how ******g bat **** everything was, that looked like simultaneous possession. Yeah, the review may not have gotten it right, but in the heat of the moment, with how close it was, can you really be surprised the refs called it a TD? **** looked like a tie when I saw it the first time.
Also, I find it funny that the refs looked at each other, nodded in agreement, then threw up different calls
This. I still don't think the pick itself was THAT bad of a call but that pass inference to get them down the field in the first place was the most egregious call of the night.
If I was a Packer fan I would have cut it off then.
- 1,996
- 86
After reading the rules, this was actually the RIGHT CALL.
A player (or players) jumping in the air has not legally gained possession of the ball until he satisfies the elements of a catch listed here.
b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands
Yes, Jennings caught the ball first but did not technically have possession or a "catch" as he was still in the air. Tate gained possesion with two hands on the ball and both feet down, while Jennings still didn't have possession or "caught" the ball, as he didn't have two feet down.
Left hand on ball
Right hand on ball, still looks like neither foot down for Jennings
By the time Jennings got both feet down, Tate had possession making it a simultaneous catch.
This is a problem with the rule, not the call, the replacement ref and the real NFL review ref got it right.
A player (or players) jumping in the air has not legally gained possession of the ball until he satisfies the elements of a catch listed here.
b) touches the ground inbounds with both feet or with any part of his body other than his hands
Yes, Jennings caught the ball first but did not technically have possession or a "catch" as he was still in the air. Tate gained possesion with two hands on the ball and both feet down, while Jennings still didn't have possession or "caught" the ball, as he didn't have two feet down.
Left hand on ball
Right hand on ball, still looks like neither foot down for Jennings
By the time Jennings got both feet down, Tate had possession making it a simultaneous catch.
This is a problem with the rule, not the call, the replacement ref and the real NFL review ref got it right.
Clyde Frog
formerly jay02
- 12,617
- 7,475
Wasn't the right call. It was a missed call. The catch doesn't mean ****. To miss that push off is just terrible. That's what matters more than the catch. Tate doesn't see that ball with Sam shields in front of him. How many times do I need to say this.
