- 20,261
- 2,188
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2006
Originally Posted by Andrew630
why did sjax take that 3 at the end...
I'm wondering the same thing. Under a minute left with a one point lead, he should have held unto to the ball and ran down clock
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by Andrew630
why did sjax take that 3 at the end...
Jefferson was covered and vince was wide open wasn't he? Vince doesn't need to take control of the game for them to win. Last year they did that all the time and he took horrible shots. but again, vince was wide open so the warriors should of read that assignment.
No. RJ cannot be the head of the offense because he can't create for himself if he gets more than single coverage. He's not a greatpasser, and if he gets double teamed, he doesn't know what to do.
Vince on the other hand is an excellent passer, and so when he gets doubled he makes the right pass for an open shot.
The problem last year was that Lawrence Frank was running a stagnant offense in which Vince would have the ball in iso, and have to go up against 2-3 defendersand the rest of the team would basically watch him. I don't care if you're Michael Jordan, no shot against 2-3 defenders is a good shot.
The offense needs to be run through Vince and not RJ... but not in the same manner it was last year.
Anyway, great win