- Feb 2, 2014
- 39,134
- 55,284
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None of those teams deserved it. Miami because they didn't even have a plot of land when they got the franchise; LA because it's a corporate shell for the league; Austin because they straight up tried to steal the team from Columbus but when that failed Garber made a special exception for the owner. All garbage.Miami, LA, and Austin are all better places than St. Louis (to have soccer team & in general)
What do you mean?
I have no issues with them at all.
But ST.LOUIS, MOSSOUREHHH??
None of those teams deserved it. Miami because they didn't even have a plot of land when they got the franchise; LA because it's a corporate shell for the league; Austin because they straight up tried to steal the team from Columbus but when that failed Garber made a special exception for the owner. All garbage.
Phoenix and Las Vegas have better shouts for a new franchise than St Louis too. Dedicated and passionate fanbases. Oh and they have actual teams that play soccer. And exist.
I’d like to throw Phx in the mix as well, why the hell does St Louis have a team but we don’t
I agree when he's in form but that was all on CourtoisSalah is unplayable when he’s like this, tight control is crazy
Also yes, all of the cities who got clubs before St Louis are absolutely better for both living and soccer culture We agree 100% there.Oh okay, that makes sense. I’m not familiar with MLS politics.
I just know which cities are better.