- Feb 3, 2015
- 5,617
- 3,335
I think it was the one from like 2005? Maybe. Copelands always had Fila Grant Hill shoes for the low. Here is another pic.Something about those look right, couldn't be the recent retro.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it was the one from like 2005? Maybe. Copelands always had Fila Grant Hill shoes for the low. Here is another pic.Something about those look right, couldn't be the recent retro.
nice.! i love the older retros shape. i rock mines once a week lol
I think it was the one from like 2005? Maybe. Copelands always had Fila Grant Hill shoes for the low. Here is another pic.
Haha I feel that
nice.! i love the older retros shape. i rock mines once a week lol
website?got my gucci 96 yesterday $28 shipped. not perfect but well worth 28
website?
Which one exactly, I have both Mutombo ll and Streetball ll, and both are close to horrible, only the deep discount saved them.Adidas retroes have been amazig lately
If the Mashburn comes out and has those changes on the midsole. I'll still buy it cause it doesn't look horrrible at all. I give it a 9 The OG version from the 90s is a 10. Now if FILA would of made some really noticeable changes on the Mashburns that would of been a NO on that. 2 Prime Examples are like how Nike in 2012 butchered the Nike Air Diamond Fury and Reebok in 2012 butchered the Reebok Blast. If something like that would of happen I would of been like hell nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!
Which one exactly, I have both Mutombo ll and Streetball ll, and both are close to horrible, only the deep discount saved them.
He is probably referring to those horrible monstrosities that they created back than to kind a represent the Blast and that awful Kamikaze lV or whatever they named it.What's your opinion on the Reebok Blast?