- 167
- 27
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
Yes my league it's H2H. I'm in the process of sending out invites, so leave your email!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
ive seen him go in the first round. if he drops to the 2nd round im scooping him up. expecting a huge year for him. 18/9/2blks/1stl is not out of his range
Thoughts of Anthony Davis this year?
Injury prone I know, but he's killing.
The way he's been performing I'm thinking about picking up as well.
ive seen him go in the first round. if he drops to the 2nd round im scooping him up. expecting a huge year for him. 18/9/2blks/1stl is not out of his range
completely disagree. i go for quality sg/sfs first. sg's and sfs can get you ast and reb. pgs cannot get rebs, c's cannot get ast. i like to have 8-10 sg/sf/pfs on my team and 1-2pgs and 1-2 c's only. pgs and c's are EASILY picked up through out the season. pgs overwhelm your team with TO's and bad fg, c's do not score enough and usually drags down FTFrom my experience, shooting guards and small forwards are the most useless positions to pick. Your team should comprise of 5 high quality point guards, 6 big men and fill the last four spots with shooting guards and small forwards that can score a decent amount of points and threes. Make sure most of your picks from rounds 1-7 are quality point guards and big men though.
http://www.rotoworld.com/teams/depth-charts/nba.aspxIs there a list of all the starting 5 for each team? I know it may not be definite as of right now, but it'd be definitely helpful...
As always, good looking out!http://www.rotoworld.com/teams/depth-charts/nba.aspxIs there a list of all the starting 5 for each team? I know it may not be definite as of right now, but it'd be definitely helpful...
completely disagree. i go for quality sg/sfs first. sg's and sfs can get you ast and reb. pgs cannot get rebs, c's cannot get ast. i like to have 8-10 sg/sf/pfs on my team and 1-2pgs and 1-2 c's only. pgs and c's are EASILY picked up through out the season. pgs overwhelm your team with TO's and bad fg, c's do not score enough and usually drags down FT
that is true but there is no way you can get 5 quality pgs on your team and start them all. if you look at the list you posted, there are only about 7 QUALITY pgs to choose from in the league and there is NO WAY you can end up with more than 3 of them. if you look at the sg/sf lists, the quality of these players drops down significantly after top 7 so you have to secure the best wings since they fill up the stat sheet nightly. if you draft a guy like rose or parker in rounds 1-3, you can easily have the same stats from a guy like ramon sessions/mo williams/jameer nelson/raymond felton in rds 9-12 if you really want assists. the depth of the pg position is too deep to waste an early pick on unless you're getting CP3 or currySteals, assists, blocks and rebounds are the hardest categories to win. These stats can all be won if you draft quality point guards and big men. Points will come depending on which point guards and big men you draft. Turnovers, ft% and fg% are all pretty unpredictable.completely disagree. i go for quality sg/sfs first. sg's and sfs can get you ast and reb. pgs cannot get rebs, c's cannot get ast. i like to have 8-10 sg/sf/pfs on my team and 1-2pgs and 1-2 c's only. pgs and c's are EASILY picked up through out the season. pgs overwhelm your team with TO's and bad fg, c's do not score enough and usually drags down FT
that is true but there is no way you can get 5 quality pgs on your team and start them all. if you look at the list you posted, there are only about 7 QUALITY pgs to choose from in the league and there is NO WAY you can end up with more than 3 of them. if you look at the sg/sf lists, the quality of these players drops down significantly after top 7 so you have to secure the best wings since they fill up the stat sheet nightly. if you draft a guy like rose or parker in rounds 1-3, you can easily have the same stats from a guy like ramon sessions/mo williams/jameer nelson/raymond felton in rds 9-12 if you really want assists. the depth of the pg position is too deep to waste an early pick on unless you're getting CP3 or curry
bigs can definitely be replaced as well deeper in the draft with guys like robin lopez/sam dalembert/jonas v/kanter/ andy v/hawes/splitter
i understand the BIGS/PG's logic when it comes to fantasy and have seen many of my friends try to use it to win leagues but it never works. i definitely would not run and grab pgs or bigs in the beginning because you will be stuck with terrible sg/sfs later in the draft
nope because i would be drafting sg/sf/pfs that avg 4-5 reb/3-4 ast that would make up for the lack of bigs/pgs. steals and blocks are those random categories that you think you can draft to win but you will never win 100% of the time but i always go for sg/sfs that average about 0.8+ stls/blks per game so it evens out. guys like evan turner/iggy/deng/leonard/johnson are more valuable to me than a joakim noah or deron williams. i feel like if you draft a lot of pgs you will definitely win ast but you will definitely lose TO's. and if you draft a lot of bigs for blocks you will definitely lose FT's/ptsThe thing is you dont need quality sg's/sf/s. As long you draft serviceable ones later in the draft you should be good. There's a lot of sleepers like Tobias Harris, Marcus Thornton, Jared Dudley that you can pick up later in the draft to compliment your core of good point guards and big men.that is true but there is no way you can get 5 quality pgs on your team and start them all. if you look at the list you posted, there are only about 7 QUALITY pgs to choose from in the league and there is NO WAY you can end up with more than 3 of them. if you look at the sg/sf lists, the quality of these players drops down significantly after top 7 so you have to secure the best wings since they fill up the stat sheet nightly. if you draft a guy like rose or parker in rounds 1-3, you can easily have the same stats from a guy like ramon sessions/mo williams/jameer nelson/raymond felton in rds 9-12 if you really want assists. the depth of the pg position is too deep to waste an early pick on unless you're getting CP3 or curry
bigs can definitely be replaced as well deeper in the draft with guys like robin lopez/sam dalembert/jonas v/kanter/ andy v/hawes/splitter
i understand the BIGS/PG's logic when it comes to fantasy and have seen many of my friends try to use it to win leagues but it never works. i definitely would not run and grab pgs or bigs in the beginning because you will be stuck with terrible sg/sfs later in the draft
You said you draft 1-2 pg's and 1-2 c's. With that many players at those positions your likely to lose in assists, steals, rebounds and blocks, true?
nope because i would be drafting sg/sf/pfs that avg 4-5 reb/3-4 ast that would make up for the lack of bigs/pgs. steals and blocks are those random categories that you think you can draft to win but you will never win 100% of the time but i always go for sg/sfs that average about 0.8+ stls/blks per game so it evens out. guys like evan turner/iggy/deng/leonard/johnson are more valuable to me than a joakim noah or deron williams. i feel like if you draft a lot of pgs you will definitely win ast but you will definitely lose TO's. and if you draft a lot of bigs for blocks you will definitely lose FT's/pts
this is only my philosophy for FBB and you are absolutely allowed to have your own opinion/strategy but i feel like it has always brought me closer to winning than any other strategy that i've seen used (will definitely be using for all of my money leagues as well)