hollakid619
Banned
- 2,390
- 11
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2003
Thought I was the only one that noticed thatOriginally Posted by JoseBronx
where was the meet? and not enough nissan
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Thought I was the only one that noticed thatOriginally Posted by JoseBronx
where was the meet? and not enough nissan
MR MONDAY NIIGHT wrote:
r8 cabriolet is ugly
youre BUGGIN
prolly not final product anyways
��
Originally Posted by shch
E39 M5 or 1st Gen CTS-V with around 80k miles and same price?? What's the consensus? I know next to nothing about the S62 M5 engine, whereas I've worked on LS based engines before. If the cars had no logos at all and you didn't know what they are, which one would you take??
e39 m5 is a classicOriginally Posted by shch
E39 M5 or 1st Gen CTS-V with around 80k miles and same price?? What's the consensus? I know next to nothing about the S62 M5 engine, whereas I've worked on LS based engines before. If the cars had no logos at all and you didn't know what they are, which one would you take??
There you go.Originally Posted by shch
CTS-V
Loads of torque
Roomy
Decent handling
Well known, easy to work on engine
Easy and cheap to make fast, insurance is also cheaper
It like copping a phone thaat was spouse to be the iPhone Killer, in the end, it fails.Originally Posted by shch
CTS-V
The shifter suuuuuuucks balls
E39 M5
Reputation for performance
Good looker
Livable interior
Handling
SMOOTH SHIFTING
but.........
Harder and more expensive to make fast (how much faster would you like400hp isnt enough)
but that car is the sole reason the V even exists.