- Dec 23, 2003
- 18,412
- 5,848
JORDAN 29 PROPAGANDA
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anytime.Thank you captain obvious! Your work here is done.......... For now....
So what are you saying Jordan shouldn't focus on performance for athletes and be more worried about regular joe basketball players like all of us, with the majority of the people just wearing the shoes casually?"performance" "performance"Yeah for guys like Russell Westbrook.
Does it really matter for the weekend warrior.
I mean, are we still tryin to be like mike.
If you aren't in the NBA by age 21, the performance ship has sailed.
Design > performance.
XX9's aint cuttin it
Source, evidence?Zoom will be in the heel.
Hmmm, lets see who is buying Jordans, the millions of heads around the world or 200-300 athletes...So what are you saying Jordan shouldn't focus on performance for athletes and be more worried about regular joe basketball players like all of us, with the majority of the people just wearing the shoes casually?
I understand the argument but at the end of the day Jordan's are performance shoes. They have casual shoes available as well but the signature shoe is always gonna focus on performance. That's how it was with the III's and XI's they were performance focused and the aesthetic grew to become a classic. I'm not comparing these to those two by any means I'm just saying every Jordan signature is gonna be performance first.
Source, evidence?
Hmmm, lets see who is buying Jordans, the millions of heads around the world or 200-300 athletes...
This is the first time in a while that the Jordan signature sure went down in price compared to the previous years so I'm actually happy with it
Haha ya but the XVII was above others and I don't consider those others actual Jordan's haha but thank you for the refresher. Would love to see Jordans get back under the 200 range.i think you forgot that it happened before:
200 usd (aj17)
175 usd (aj1
165 usd (aj20)
180 usd (aj21)
170 usd (aj2011)
So what are you saying Jordan shouldn't focus on performance for athletes and be more worried about regular joe basketball players like all of us, with the majority of the people just wearing the shoes casually?
Yep, it's a sad day when the best looking part of a shoe is the one no one seesThe only thing I like are the outsoles. The rest is horrid.
Zoom will be in the heel.
Believe me I understand how you feel and would love to see a better casual wear shoe but I know it won't happen with the sig line, it's always gonna be performance basketball focused as it should be.Hell to the ahhhhh......yeah!!!
Most of the market are casual wearers, you know, guys like you and me.
Hell we bought into the brand for years, with our hard earned money. Paid tinkers salary.
Gearing towards us should be priority number one.
Believe me I understand how you feel and would love to see a better casual wear shoe but I know it won't happen with the sig line, it's always gonna be performance basketball focused as it should be.
To show their flexibility in creating different prints in the upper.Why are there 2 versions?
well dam. I remember watching this, it was the Presidents cup I think. So for those of us that aren't impressed with these 29's, we just gotta watch for Keegans shoes in a few weeks to see the design of the 30sI can't believe that Keegan Bradley has been wearing a golf shoe version of these since last October. Crazy that nobody knew that was gonna be the upper design of the XX9. It was right under our noses.
Ya unfortunately this era of sneakers is more about the crazier colorways and better technology. Plus what made some of the Jordan's so great was the leather uppers that gave you solid colorways and designs. Now we have the flyknit, flight weave, carbon fiber, foamposite stuff that lets the designers go crazy with designs.Really though, I'd like to see best of both worlds. My standards are too high coming from that 90's era of basketball shoes where you did see both design and performance.
I've always favored aesthetics, more-so even back when I played HS bball.