- 33,427
- 39,199
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2005
I wish the BHM's had the huge Jumpman on them like the debut XX9. They are still nice though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I agree with this. I had the XX8 SE and that "extra bounce" was bc the zoom unit protruded so much. But this is also why they always got shredded. Now it's more flush with the outsole so it does not provide as much feedback but still the same cushioning. At least that's what I think and feel when using the XX9. Longevity has obviously been improved bc of this also. FWIW, I was actually one of those that didn't like the protruding unit on the XX8. I like to play low to the ground and it always made me feel unbalanced for some reason esp when guarding really quick players. Went back to the Kobe 9.
now you know why they were $140Got my pair in today that I paid $140 for..... was excited of course... And this is what I get
So if you buy a shoe online from Footlocker on clearance for $49.99, you expect it to have obvious defects? Sure, they come from a store, but you don't see the exact pair.
might depend on WHO you get them from and IF you get to see them (like in a store)
sorry but i will always question it when priced that low
thanks for your input
good points
So if you buy a shoe online from Footlocker on clearance for $49.99, you expect it to have obvious defects? Sure, they come from a store, but you don't see the exact pair.
And if your thought process is "Well then I'll just return it," then that proves the point because your statement doesn't include that option. You said you will always question it.
Honestly curious. No shots. I don't understand that line of thinking. If a seller list a shoe as DS and doesn't list any flaws, I expect it to be DS without any flaws no matter the cost. Of course I don't know if the seller in question gave photos or description or what. Just saying.
I should add that I'm not referring to the SEs.the bhm will be the only cw i get
i rock mine casually just fine
good points
im guessing that at that price it was a private sale and may or may not have a return policy
so its not always an option
appears complete pictures were not provided or he would'nt have bought
do you think seller would have asked more if they were in better shape ?
just sayin there was a reason they were priced at $140
man you're dumb as hell dude, thats fair market value. the shoe is a shoe.... no matter the price. they were tried on and obviously tested out. sole was still clean, but she was creased to sxxx. i would have considered keeping if the seller wasnt a complete douche. claim is already opened. people suck. maybe ill just pass on this and cop the BHM instead
I should add that I'm not referring to the SEs.
its obvious the shoe had been tried on..it was an unclaimed pair i snatched up at my local HOHGot my pair in today that I paid $140 for..... was excited of course... And this is what I get
correct..i had 7 pairs to begin with..was down to 1..but because of this return im back at 2..first 4 sold for 200+..last 3 im throwing for the steal..didnt even notice the creases but if its that big of a problem i will get them back and throw them back out there on the market for the low..o wellEveybody by now should know of Nike/JB quality issues. Thatprobably had nothing to do with the price in this case. I bet the seller, didnt even notice. Plenty of people can't even give the GOF xx9s away at $140. Thats market price/value right now.
Not saying its correct, but thats just what it is.
complete douche...you wanted me to paypal you 50 dollars because someone tried on a DEADSTOCK shoe..lol (and then you had the nerve to put "USED" in the claim..lol)man you're dumb as hell dude, thats fair market value. the shoe is a shoe.... no matter the price. they were tried on and obviously tested out. sole was still clean, but she was creased to sxxx. i would have considered keeping if the seller wasnt a complete douche. claim is already opened. people suck. maybe ill just pass on this and cop the BHM instead
its obvious the shoe had been tried on..it was an unclaimed pair i snatched up at my local HOH
correct..i had 7 pairs to begin with..was down to 1..but because of this return im back at 2..first 4 sold for 200+..last 3 im throwing for the steal..didnt even notice the creases but if its that big of a problem i will get them back and throw them back out there on the market for the low..o well
complete douche...you wanted me to paypal you 50 dollars because someone tried on a DEADSTOCK shoe..lol (and then you had the nerve to put "USED" in the claim..lol)
but im the douche..ok
@skep
at the end of the day you were an unsatisfied customer that wanted a return because of a crease (understandable)
i have no problem refunding you your money when i receive those 29s back..