- Dec 26, 2011
- 928
- 1,081
It looks good to me, but wanted to get a second look to see if these are legit
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Air Jordan 13 “Blue Grey”
Color: White/Yellow Ochre-Blue Grey-Black
Style Code: 414571-170
Release Date: February 10, 2024
Price: $200
These come in men’s sizing?
Air Jordan 13 “Dune Red”
Color: Dune Red/Dune Red-Terra Blush-White
Style Code: DJ5982-601
Release Date: June 29, 2024
Price: $210
Expect the Chutney XIII Mid to look like this, according to this one.
They look very similar to the pair that released 4-5 years ago. I got that retro from a Nike Outlet for $99 lol
Awesome read. Congrats.Back in June 98....twin and I were 12 going on 13 and had to beg our parents for these. By the time we finally convinced them, there was only one 10.5 or 11 left in the city...my brother got them and I got some Pro Strongs (which we both still have). I have the 2017 retro (came out my bday weekend no less), but it wasn't the same as the OG. Took me all this time to find an original pair for a reasonable price ($285 for those wondering)...which I don't even intend to wear. It's just the nostalgia of finally owning it that makes me happy.
A reglue would be necessary obviously if I do, but the hologram on the left shoe is already cracking too. I don't mind the money spent to just stare at em. That OG red has never been matched just right
Jordan Brand takes pride in butchering their own classic models.. they know you’ll buy these regardless.They need to put the 13s in the vault until they can fix this.
They need to put the 13s in the vault until they can fix this.
Jordan Brand takes pride in butchering their own classic models.. they know you’ll buy these regardless.
Did the OGs and early retro 13s crease that bad in the toebox?I still believe this is a years-long holdover result of the days when everyone and their mother moaned nonstop about creasing.
Did the OGs and early retro 13s crease that bad in the toebox?
Didn't they start shrinking cushioning though? I guess they figured out lifestyle shoes could stand to be less comfortable.Yes, relatively speaking. They were actual soft leather. Back in the aughts, there was an era on here and elsewhere where people b'tched incessantly about shoes creasing. And then we started getting retros with these super stiff toe boxes. Reminds me of all the talk about crumbled midsoles (remember, this was in the early and mid 2000s, where a lot of OG pairs weren't yet THAT super old) and people moaning they couldn't wear their OGs anymore. And then Nike started using closed-cell midsoles to make them last a lot longer but at the expense of comfort. These types of things are, now that I look back on it, probably when we can say retro Jordans became lifestyle shoes and not shoes you really wanted to play in. Not all of them, obviously, but a lot of them.
Didn't they start shrinking cushioning though? I guess they figured out lifestyle shoes could stand to be less comfortable.
Pretty stupid that they remade the AJ 1s as Zoom CMFTs instead of just improving the OG and 85s models internally to simply make them more comfortable to begin with. They added full length air to AJ2 retros so it's not like they've never done this before either.