airthompson
Staff member
- Jul 30, 2008
- 13,828
- 9,634
what's sad is that EVERY shoe that was released in the CDP and is re-releasing is WORSE quality than the cdp ( 3s, 4s, 5s )I personally feel that of all the retros released as part of a cdp, the only two shoes worth noting are the carmine vi's and the hare vii's. Everything might as well be a "nu retro" or a retro.5 considering how poor the quality was for each shoe. Cdp bred xi's are no different. I personally don't consider them to be a "real pair" of xi's. Tha'ts just me though.
The XIII's and XVI's were pretty decent, but I get your point overall. Around that period is really when the decline in JB quality was most noticeable.
cant agree. XI cant be worse than the CDP XI. shape alone >>>>>>>>>
The CDP Vs came preyellowed
CDP III leather wasnt as good as the 2011 leather
People hated the banana shape IV and how ashy they were. now they mad at the material... its a wash on these two.
2010 or so retro IX was better quality than CDP IX also
eh.. wasn't feeling the shiny midsole on the 2011 3s. Them ashy larry black friday 4s are hideous so i'd take the CDP over those too. and i'd gladly take the 5s over those heinsenberg blue 5s coming out in january. Guess agree to disagree
You stated the CDP had better quality, but ur only stating ur dislikes with the appearances of the newer retros. Not the quality. I had every pack except 1/22, and I gotta say all of em were booty. The 10/13, maybe 16 were just ok. The III's cracked immediately, my '11 retro 3's look DS after 6-8 wears. IV's paint peeled off like a lottery ticket, and the '12 retro 4's have been best quality 4's since '04 (excluding Fire Reds). I'd agree the CDPs had more of an og looked, but no comparison quality wise.