- 7,309
- 3,922
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2004
how bout the wht/reds quality wise?
As a guy who cant get enough of em (2 pairs of navy lows). Yes, they are really buttery. Same as chi's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
how bout the wht/reds quality wise?
As a guy who cant get enough of em (2 pairs of navy lows). Yes, they are really buttery. Same as chi's.
As a guy who cant get enough of em (2 pairs of navy lows). Yes, they are really buttery. Same as chi's.
how bout the wht/reds quality wise?
how bout the wht/reds quality wise?
Plastichow bout the wht/reds quality wise?
As a guy who cant get enough of em (2 pairs of navy lows). Yes, they are really buttery. Same as chi's.
They are inferior to the Chicago's and white/navy blue pairs.how bout the wht/reds quality wise?
Repped.Heard white/reds were pretty bad but slightly better than breds, royals, shadows.
Heard white/reds were pretty bad but slightly better than breds, royals, shadows. Im still gonna get the white/reds for collections sake and I like the og color blocking(white upper with the accents colored).
To be honest, the royals have the worst quality out of all of them.
I'm with you. I've considered selling all my OG highs and going with the slept on lows
As a guy who cant get enough of em (2 pairs of navy lows). Yes, they are really buttery. Same as chi's.
Are there any more sites that have the black ones at retail ?Been wearing the black swooshless in the last couple weeks. LOVE THESE SHOES!! The buttery leather really makes the shoes look new everytime. One of the few Jordan that I'm willing to pay retail.
If quality on majority of the lows wasn't complete ****, I would have this whole set as well
royals breds and shadow lows all have that stiff card board leather. But Chicagos leather is sooooofff-Tttttt lolWow I don't think the low royals are that bad ...
Dope pic. Kinda look like SBs in this picThese have been heavy in my rotation lately, can't wait until September.
Wow I don't think the low royals are that bad ...
I'm def in the minority also, I kinda like the Royal 1 lows. I know the quality is nothing like the metallic 1's. The fact its Royal colorway and was so cheap makes me happy enough to beat it up. I think the more I break them in the softer it gets, although it's still not comparable to the other pairs.
My Royals are probably my fav beater pair but the creases look horrible. After 6 months of casual wear, I legitimately don't know if the upper can stand another 6 months of the same... Nike/JB really cut corners on materials with this release.
im glad you guys agree , BUT i also hope they re-release them with premium leather in lowsI'm def in the minority also, I kinda like the Royal 1 lows. I know the quality is nothing like the metallic 1's. The fact its Royal colorway and was so cheap makes me happy enough to beat it up. I think the more I break them in the softer it gets, although it's still not comparable to the other pairs.
im glad you guys agree , BUT i also hope they re-release them with premium leather in lows
Did you guys notice the low 1 no swoosh runs bigger than the other low 1's? Is it the premium leather ?
Did you guys notice the low 1 no swoosh runs bigger than the other low 1's? Is it the premium leather ?
They all run bigger. Everyone's been going .5 down for swoosh lows. Are the no swoosh full size down?