- 232
- 285
while i agree that some of these have been so stylistically altered that they shouldn't even be considered "Jordan Xs" anymore, i don't think that inherently makes them bad. they're just not the same thing.New Jordan models that divert from the look of retros are a no-go.. Zoom 1s are great since they don’t try and change the actual look of AJ 1s into a different kind of shoe entirely but models like these and Dub Zeros (Yuck!), Futures, Spizikes, Son of Mars, etc. etc. are hideous since they butcher classic tooling designs with new style uppers, which doesn’t work because the old models are so iconic.
Last edited: