1
123207
Guest
Link to EU raffle for tie dye 1s pls ...
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Mar 1, 2007
- 7,138
- 6,238
https://launches.endclothing.com/product/air-jordan-1-high-og-w-cd0461-100
UK9.5 biggest size avail
UK9.5 biggest size avail
- Jan 25, 2015
- 10,631
- 12,886
**** END
- Mar 1, 2007
- 7,138
- 6,238
I'm with you!
1st and only time I hit was on a pair of '17 Royals.
- Jan 25, 2015
- 10,631
- 12,886
No white midsole? Sigh.
- Jan 25, 2015
- 10,631
- 12,886
Since '16. Haven't won once.
JPS
formerly instagram
- May 4, 2015
- 30,844
- 36,283
i dont think they had white midsoles from when they first dropped no?
- Jan 25, 2015
- 10,631
- 12,886
Don't remember. White midsoles are infinitely better.
JPS
formerly instagram
- May 4, 2015
- 30,844
- 36,283
agreed. I just remember them as the jordans cassie wore in her video lmao
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,163
- 70,132
They were black
- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,629
- 27,195
I’m ready for all the Co.JP’s
- May 30, 2003
- 4,728
- 6,568
Doom.
aint trippin thothe og pe sample had a black midsole with gold collars (this is what the 2020 pair looks like its going to be)
the 2003 release had a black midsole too
but the mythical 1985 friends & family release had a white midsole
and so did the 2013 release with a transluscent gum sole
- Jun 21, 2015
- 13,963
- 17,878
Those Navy Co.JP 
- Sep 26, 2011
- 778
- 2,164
- Sep 26, 2011
- 778
- 2,164
weren’t the Koston lows inspired by those?
- Jul 20, 2012
- 10,669
- 11,122
- Jan 25, 2015
- 10,631
- 12,886
*grits teeth*
- Apr 7, 2013
- 1,126
- 1,853
- Mar 27, 2014
- 853
- 293
I know what you mean. I'm upset I didn't try for the rookie of the year and now I'm regretting it. Buy now think later...hoping to come across a sz 12 for a decent price.Hesitated for a second and boom the pair is nds Storm Blues I was watching on GOAT disappeared. I need a sz 14!!! It’s dry out here for them.
- May 26, 2013
- 981
- 1,552
Coworker ordered a fake pair of Chicago's from one of these fake China sellers that says they're 1:1. I had to compare them to my legit pair (from eastbay) and damn they're pretty close. In hand, side by side, in natural light they look very close. Only things I really noticed was on the real pair, the swoosh is a bit bigger, the leather is softer, and the toe box is a bit slimmer. Beside that, I'm sure on feet and a bit broken in you wouldn't be able to tell at all. Be careful if you're still trying to cop a pair
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,163
- 70,132
Scary
- Nov 16, 2018
- 31,417
- 65,440
There's clear differences side by side. The top one looks real, the midsoles, toebox, aj logo, & upper ankle collar looks the part.
Coworker ordered a fake pair of Chicago's from one of these fake China sellers that says they're 1:1. I had to compare them to my legit pair (from eastbay) and damn they're pretty close. In hand, side by side, in natural light they look very close. Only things I really noticed was on the real pair, the swoosh is a bit bigger, the leather is softer, and the toe box is a bit slimmer. Beside that, I'm sure on feet and a bit broken in you wouldn't be able to tell at all. Be careful if you're still trying to cop a pair
- Jan 24, 2016
- 1,383
- 10,890
On feet today
- Mar 1, 2007
- 7,138
- 6,238
Side by side comparos are rare in the real world. The untrained eye or “non-sneaker trained” eye will not know the difference. (Or care.... )
It’s crazy how far these Reps have come along....
It’s crazy how far these Reps have come along....
- Dec 24, 2016
- 5,258
- 5,939
I had three pairs and offed em all. Got fomo again just last month and bought one again. Won’t be making the same mistake this time around.
