- May 15, 2003
- 56,662
- 65,621
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
after it's all said and done, frags go down as the goat. and not bc I have them, bc that's the Jordan 1 that changed everything and brought us into this new "remastered" era of 1s. this all started with frags as much as many of yall will hate this comment. its facts.Man those look so wonky to me nowI'm so used to the remaster height and look that the others just ain't cutting it anymore. If I already had em I'd feel differently but since I don't, I'd see no reason to justify buying the real "banned" 1 or any pairs from that era and any 1s before the frags.
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,211
- 70,284
Delete
- Mar 15, 2014
- 5,630
- 8,266
Only good thing was the shade of red they used
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
theres a reason everytime I look at my '16 breds or royals, I cringe. theres a reason they still on ice. they look deformed. the shape is all wrong. the tumbling is horrendous. yea, I copped, but I wasnt happy about it.
- Mar 3, 2014
- 1,016
- 1,143
everyone is entitled to their own opinion but yours is wrong
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
frags are the new goat until further notice...
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
hows it "dumb" if its MY opinion? you sound dumb!
do u even have both iterations? if not, shut up...
- Mar 3, 2014
- 1,016
- 1,143
hows it "dumb" if its MY opinion? you sound dumb!
do u even have both iterations? if not, shut up...
of course i do - its how i know you're talking out of your ***
- Apr 15, 2015
- 6,050
- 15,100
Smithbeentrill
formerly domosavage
- Jul 13, 2015
- 3,903
- 3,586
Okay, no jumpman either
(secretly hoping they have tumbled leather over that flat **** everyone wants)
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
I could give a huge rhinoceros **** what either of yall think or feel about MY opinion. I mean, apparently yall are so smart yall think the '16s are better bc the leather is "softer." FOH!
- Apr 28, 2015
- 997
- 526
Could these be on par with the Chicago pairs from 2015?
- Apr 15, 2015
- 6,050
- 15,100
16' > 13'
13s got that squatty look with the banana toe. Not knocking anyone who digs em but they arent better than the 16's I've felt both and side by sided them. Also, the 13's shape was more narrow so if you have a wider foot your pinky toes would suffer. Never had that issue with any remaster.
13s got that squatty look with the banana toe. Not knocking anyone who digs em but they arent better than the 16's I've felt both and side by sided them. Also, the 13's shape was more narrow so if you have a wider foot your pinky toes would suffer. Never had that issue with any remaster.
- Apr 15, 2015
- 6,050
- 15,100
It's not that serious but you speaking kinda in hyperbole is crazy. The hottest of takes.
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
just wanna throw out there that neither pair of '13s have glitter, while BOTH of my '16s do.
- Dec 11, 2007
- 14,076
- 14,309
again, not going back n forth with you about MY opinion. last thing I'll say is some agree with me. some don't. who is right? u see how that works? yea, opinions....
- Nov 12, 2005
- 1,664
- 4,347
- Apr 28, 2015
- 997
- 526
NO. We JUST got THOSE. ( Feel free to use this quote on any future OG Jordan release ) .
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,211
- 70,284
Woke up on one
- Apr 15, 2015
- 6,050
- 15,100
I hope, absolutely hope we get the curved midsole
2
225159
Guest
By the look the shape and the big check these got to be the og sky high 1's
- Dec 4, 2016
- 1,669
- 4,195
I'm not the double up type but this might be the release where I double up
- May 7, 2002
- 10,855
- 20,164
16' > 13'
13s got that squatty look with the banana toe. Not knocking anyone who digs em but they arent better than the 16's I've felt both and side by sided them. Also, the 13's shape was more narrow so if you have a wider foot your pinky toes would suffer. Never had that issue with any remaster.
It’s funny you mention sizing...
When I first saw that the mold would be re-worked to the original ‘85 pairs, first thing that ran through my mind was that I’m going to have to figure out my sizing on 1’s yet again
..............
- Apr 28, 2015
- 997
- 526
They get mad glittery when you never even take em out the box to wipe em off.
