- 1,173
- 2,714
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2018
DJ Folk’s info is golden in case ya don’t know
Down for 2 minimum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
DJ Folk’s info is golden in case ya don’t know
DJ Folk’s info is golden in case ya don’t know
balls deep
DJ Folk’s info is golden in case ya don’t know
So, "OG cut, OG height?" I love how JB does stuff like this to convince me that I need ANOTHER Blk/Red 1, only 3 years from the last drop. I have 2001s, 2013s, and 2016s, in Crippled-DS condition, so not sure if I'll even swing for these. What exactly differentiates these upcoming Blk/Reds from the "Banned" pair in 2016?
2016 breds that i own have tumble leather on swoosh and toe box... was it suppose to be smooth?I swear to god, if it's tumble in any shape or form then I'm off it.
2016 breds that i own have tumble leather on swoosh and toe box... was it suppose to be smooth?
Can we get OG pricing too ?
i'd be in for 5 if they did that lol
I guess so but the client wanted it done this way.Couldn't you, essentially achieve the same effect with lasers and the neutral gray lows? Just need some dye, gac, and paint, I'd assume to get the neutral gray accents.
Naw watch. They make it all flat leather (which we want), and the perfect shade of red (which we always argue about, but this time they’ll pitch how it’s EXACTLY like the ‘85s), but have changes like the back/heel will be flat and not curved (like the 85s), and a higher collar height, and of course they’ll keep telling us how they’re just like the 85s. This is all cool and all, but literally every release they tell us how their various pairs are “like the originals,” even putting words like “OG” and “Retro” in the names, but every release they tweak something to show prove that THIS pair is even closer to the originals. It’s just exhausting.I swear to god, if it's tumble in any shape or form then I'm off it.
Thanks for that info.Those were the "banned" b/reds. If it's as OG as Folk claims it shouldn't have a speck of tumbling on it cuz the originals didn't.
7 months flies by quick af when you old and washed like me
This is what I don’t get. Both the 2013 and 2016 pairs claim, and are named as such, to be “Retro High OG.” Soooooo what is JB saying they’ve been giving us all these years? “We’ve been talking out of our *** these past couple of releases, but this time......we’re telling the truth.” They’ll probably be named the “‘85s” or something, and eventually they’ll rerelease all of our faves with this same designation.Didn't the 2016 have the OG hight? As well
7 months flies by quick af when you old and washed like me