- Oct 10, 2016
- 80
- 14
You won't be disappointed. One of my favorite pairs of 1's this past year.
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,086
- 8,627
I hope you never block me papi
- Dec 27, 2007
- 2,979
- 2,441
you won't be disappointed unless you're of a "tumbled or bust" mindset.
- Oct 10, 2016
- 80
- 14
Just copped the Baron 1's for $220, DS. Too much or naw? Been wanting them to add to the collection.
1
126006
Guest
Never b.
- Feb 18, 2013
- 18,086
- 8,627
- Jan 10, 2013
- 3,136
- 883
Brah, first cotton tongues now plastic swooshes. Which 85 are you talkin about?
Ingenious Bastard
formerly ingenious nick
- Feb 12, 2013
- 4,283
- 4,712
Good to hear. Thanks for the feedback guys.
Now on to the Storm Blue's for a steal.
- Oct 26, 2013
- 23,107
- 15,455
- Dec 28, 2014
- 654
- 578
Yep, got it from them at $112 and received my pair. Everything looked good. Mine shipped from PA so it was quick to NYC. They also throw in a couple random things in the packaging + a future coupon code.
1
126006
Guest
Thank you for the info, repped
- Dec 12, 2005
- 5,407
- 3,444
I'm so close to pulling, they close to UNC leather? CM?
- Nov 4, 2005
- 818
- 696
85's do indeed have a synthetic swoosh.
- Dec 27, 2007
- 2,979
- 2,441
more CM than UNC
- Dec 12, 2005
- 5,407
- 3,444
That's not so bad, CMs get better with wear too. I've been waiting to see if these dip below 99 shipped, cheapest I've seen but I'm getting impatient. Thanks for the help
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- Dec 18, 2014
- 8,180
- 9,262
What we should expect
Last edited:
babyjs23
Staff member
- May 3, 2009
- 19,955
- 26,571
PS 
- Feb 17, 2010
- 11,459
- 15,619
- Oct 5, 2015
- 7,205
- 5,019
Wait, wait, wait..........I just saw that "numbered tag" inside the collar of that Royals pic. Isn't that supposed to be strictly for the 2016 Banneds/Breds?!
After seeing that numbered tag that is originally in 2016 Bred pairs, NO ******* WAY these are early release pics of the 2017 Royals.........no way, this is definitely a recolored 2016 Bred.
I ain't believing anything UNTIL Jordan Brand gives me the official pics.........THESE ARE NOT THE REAL 2017 ROYALS, SORRY GUYS
Last edited:
- Feb 17, 2010
- 11,459
- 15,619
- May 30, 2003
- 4,728
- 6,568
calm down bro....he never said they were early release pics
its a photoshop of banneds and all he said was "what we should expect"
its a photoshop of banneds and all he said was "what we should expect"
- Oct 5, 2015
- 7,205
- 5,019
Got you, but at the same time........you know lurkers from Sole Collector, Complex, and SneakerNews.com are creeping over this thread (and the 2017 Royals thread) 24/7.
So I'm just setting the record straight before those lurking n00bs use these photoshop/repaint customs AND create clickbait articles to post on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram to bait misinformed fools into believe that the 2017 Royals could possibly have a numbered tag in the collar.
That being said, kudos to the person that managed to make a custom Royals out his own pair of 2016 Breds.
Last edited:
- Jan 14, 2014
- 4,776
- 7,540
People should take all leaked pics with a huge grain of salt right now. We haven't even seen solid pics of releases that are coming out in Feb., yet we would of a shoe that's not coming out until April? (Even that date is still up for debate)
I mean realistically would there even be a fully built shoe from a factory at this time?
I mean realistically would there even be a fully built shoe from a factory at this time?
- May 12, 2013
- 2,157
- 527
i know its photoshop but i hope they dont release em with this crocodile crap swoosh like the banned , i am in for the butterish toe box leather but please not that ugly swoosh
dhtowng
Supporter
- May 22, 2010
- 9,907
- 20,770
Thank you! People gotta stop letting this kind of stuff slide on here. False information should not be allowed and passed around on this forum.
