dacomeup
Supporter
- Jan 20, 2006
- 26,916
- 38,438
He hasn’t taken payment from Wisconsin. That has been clear. The attorney representing him has reiterated that. They’re claiming tortious interference for a contract that’s not even legal in the sport yet? They know it’s BS and they’re just grandstanding. The kid signed an MOU that’s contingent on the House settlement — but the agreement is supposed to be NIL based anyways. They don’t want the players to be classified as employees. So what’s the damages for a marketing agreement for a player who no one knows lol. They’re begging the NCAA, who wants nothing to do with actually doing anything to get involved.I’m just proud that I called out the tortious interference claim first. I should be tweeting this stuff.
The house settlement takes effect on July 1. All the schools are front loading money to pay out immediately so it’s not subject to the scrutiny of the house settlement. So all that stuff Mulvaney is saying probably doesn’t apply if the kid already took payment under the contract. The kid will allege he tried to pay them back in full. Wisconsin will allege they didn’t recruit his position because of the agreement they had with him and performance on their end. They’ll say they were harmed by his breach.