- Apr 24, 2005
- 43,751
- 8,855
Unless there’s unequal revenue sharing that pays them upwards of 80/90m a year they’re not going to the BigXII
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea, it’s in a better spot until those schools inevitably leave for the SEC/B1G, but it’s also why it makes no sense for those schools to go to the Big 12 .I think long term the B12 is in a better spot of stability than the ACC. Once that contract is up you know the B1G/SEC is going to take Miami, UNC, Va Tech, Duke, and a few others (FSU and Clemson should they not leave for the B12). It’s only a matter of time IMO.
Again, the B12 isn’t a “better” conference but it’s long term stability looks better than the ACC’s
Along with the defense, this has been a single biggest disappointment of the Lincoln Riley era at USC. I assume that he would be able to turn things around quickly because he would keep a lot of the best players in California home but that hasn't been the case.
Along with the defense, this has been a single biggest disappointment of the Lincoln Riley era at USC. I assume that he would be able to turn things around quickly because he would keep a lot of the best players in California home but that hasn't been the case.