- May 30, 2006
- 25,305
- 13,359
Good lord Tennessee is horrendous.
OFFICIAL 2021 COLLEGE FOOTBALL OFFSEASON THREAD
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Bobby Layne,
- Start date
- Status
dacomeup
Supporter
- Jan 20, 2006
- 26,607
- 37,559
They should go and get Hugh Freeze and call it a day.
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,041
- 85,637
Should the Heisman even be close at this point? Trask got 15 more TDs than Mac Jones.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
Pac12 refs. 
Makeup call from OSU though.
Makeup call from OSU though.
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
Was just about to say it’s poetic justice for those Oregon State calls, even though those were basically on goal to go.Pac12 refs.
Makeup call from OSU though.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
Coastal Carolina gives me FGCU vibes from the NCAA tourney a few plus years ago.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,470
- 195,978
Big turnover and are about to get zero points
Edit: got 3 at least
Edit: got 3 at least
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,470
- 195,978
Great catch
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,470
- 195,978
These spots are crazy
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
These spots are crazy
Laughable.
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
Hopefully Pac 12 refs give us another pac 12 review 
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
These announcers saying that stanford should go for it on 4th down with 15 seconds, up 5 are imbeciles. "Even if you don't get it, there's only 15 seconds left." Yeah... so kick the ******* FG and squib it. You go up 8 and force UW to at best convert twice.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,470
- 195,978
They might as well go for it. Stanford sneezes and gets a 1st down
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
You want them to go for it lso you can force a turnover ol
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
Nah, you go for it. 15 seconds especially, but not sure where you got that...its still a good decision with :38 left.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
More likelihood of a big play on a FG than a 4th and inches.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,470
- 195,978
Like I said just happened though
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
The clock had initially run below a minute so there would have been a 10 sec runoff plus the playclock, but they reset the clock to 1:03.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,470
- 195,978
Oh damn, they trying to put hands on Zach
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
With the 10 second runoff it would've been 30 something seconds. The final play reflected :38...they changed it again..regardless, it was the right decision even if they didn't get it.
And smfh at @'ing that guy too.
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
Yeah no, I know. lol.
I'm saying originally before it was stopped for a review, the refs let the clock run down to like :58 seconds. So the announcers and TV reffing expert were speculating that with a 10 second runoff, and then letting the playclock run all the way down that UW would have had about :15 secs left after Stanford ran whatever play they ran.
It's unimportant because correctly, or not, Pac12 refs reset the clock to 1:03 so there was no runoff because it wasn't under a minute.
- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,809
- 30,205
FOH
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,473
- 12,600
He was 1 for 5 to start. 8 for 16 right now. Against Coastal Carolina, who before last week most people in this thread prob didn't even know was FBS. Eww.
FOH
- Status
