- 11,459
- 15,619
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2010
oakland isnt cheap they either put the money towards the city or give the money to the teams. Im being cheap not oakland.You can probably relate to being cheap
View media item 2467508
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
oakland isnt cheap they either put the money towards the city or give the money to the teams. Im being cheap not oakland.You can probably relate to being cheap
This is the quickest I can remember getting real off season chatter in a long time. Usually there's a week long Finals discussion and hangover
This is all being sent out there by Ainge as a smokescreen. Trade Isiah, blame it on Hayward and draft Fultzhttp://www.yardbarker.com/mobile/content/article/s1_127_24166090
but I do hear Hayward has significant concerns about playing with Isaiah Thomas,” said MacMahon, per Drew Mackay of FanSided. “In other words, he wants the ball in his hands. He doesn’t just want to watch Isaiah dribble around and do his thing.”
Welp
explain because i thought cleveland paid 54mill for being over the cap space.You have absolutely no idea what cap space means.
explain because i thought cleveland paid 54mill for being over the cap space.
You can't be serious?
Not a chance.then they trading thomas lol
i should pay you 50 for explaing that for me honestly didnt know not ashamed to admit it. So the warriors basically have two players locked in with steph getting a max contract which is almost a third of cap space. So iguadala, livingston, zaza, etc are going to take a minimum on the back end of their career to stay on a winning team? [emoji]129300[/emoji]Maybe we step back a little bit and slow it down for you because that seems to be a little necessary. To sign a free agent, you need cap space or to convince said player to take the league minimum, MLE, or MMLE. Both of which are tiny fractions of what a player like Hayward will be paid in free agency. Since they don't have cap space, they would have to convince him to take a 100M+ discount to play in the only place worse than salt lake. 99.99999999999999999999% chance of never happening.
You know what, I'm glad you didn't pay up. I would have felt bad after reading some of your dumb *** posts.
i should pay you 50 for explaing that for me honestly didnt know not ashamed to admit it. So the warriors basically have two players locked in with steph getting a max contract which is almost a third of cap space. So iguadala, livingston, zaza, etc are going to take a minimum on the back end of their career to stay on a winning team? [emoji]129300[/emoji]
You can always make cap space though. GS just did it last year.
Hayward is way too beta. I'd rather we sign Blake.
nowadays its easy to make cap space
Im sure some team will help the LeBron and take Shumpert and Thompson's contracts off his hands. It never fails.
Don't know about that. Teams pretty much have to attach a draft pick to a terrible contract to dump them. Warriors cap space was mostly created due to owners being dumb and letting the cap raise like 25M in a single year. Say what you want about superstars, but the owners basically created the space needed to sign KD
damn i guess its a wrap for the landCorrect. You can stretch a players contract over a couple of years or try to trade a player for space. Unfortunately Cleveland has 50M wrapped up in shump, JR, and TT plus the 75M they owe the big three so the chances of it happening are extremely thin considering the cap is like 103M if I recall correctly.
Not to mention you can't trade first rounders in consecutive years so they technically can't trade a first until 2021 I believe. At that point you have to look and see how seriously you think lebron and co can contend.
They are pretty much ******.
They still had to trade Bogut for a heavily protected 2nd. I'm sure the cavs could find those deals too. Might even get an asset for TT and shumpert.
Thought it was the players that moved to have a huge cap increase and the owners who were in favor of smoothing over several years?
damn i guess its a wrap for the landCorrect. You can stretch a players contract over a couple of years or try to trade a player for space. Unfortunately Cleveland has 50M wrapped up in shump, JR, and TT plus the 75M they owe the big three so the chances of it happening are extremely thin considering the cap is like 103M if I recall correctly.
Not to mention you can't trade first rounders in consecutive years so they technically can't trade a first until 2021 I believe. At that point you have to look and see how seriously you think lebron and co can contend.
They are pretty much ******.