- 72,391
- 116,078
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2011
Love is a GREAT 3rd option. Just happens to be a not so great fit against the Warriors, especially now that they have KD.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
who is the lefty...he was legitMy favorite BMORE squad
who is the lefty...he was legit
that boy heart pumps koolaid
almost positive or positive, they had 28 million tied up in thompson, shump, n mosgov alone going into love's free agency yearI still don't think you understand how the salary cap works. Teams generally end up going into the luxury tax when they have to re-sign players that are already on their team to bigger contracts. I'm almost positive that they wouldn't have had the cap space to add Kevin Love to what they already had in place, if Wiggins were there.
You are just olderIs it me or do HS players look MUCH younger these days than they did back in the day?
Is it me or do HS players look MUCH younger these days than they did back in the day?
Junglejim posted on the last page that they only had the MLE left. Kevin Love isn't playing for no damb MLE.almost positive or positive
Idk what it is but every tim I watch an old NBA, game I be thinking the players are like 35. You ever see Karl Malone at 25? He looked 41. People used to look old as ****
some people are just like that . Greg oden always looked like a late 30 year old . even when he was in college .Idk what it is but every tim I watch an old NBA, game I be thinking the players are like 35. You ever see Karl Malone at 25? He looked 41. People used to look old as ****
Idk what it is but every tim I watch an old NBA, game I be thinking the players are like 35. You ever see Karl Malone at 25? He looked 41. People used to look old as ****
almost positive or positive
that doesn't account for them making space to attempt to sign loveJunglejim posted on the last page that they only had the MLE left. Kevin Love isn't playing for no damb MLE.
This is going nowhere.that doesn't account for them making space to attempt to sign love
This is going nowhere.
*que talking to a wall gif
no because your talking about the roster that was constructed in 2015,and I'm telling you they had 28 mil tied up in thompson, mosgov, and shump, with another 8 in frye, there is enough there for the cavs to find 19 for loveThis is going nowhere.
that can be said on the hour every hour in hereThis is going nowhere.
no because your talking about the roster that was constructed in 2015,and I'm telling you they had 28 mil tied up in thompson, mosgov, and shump, with another 8 in frye, there is enough there for the cavs to find 19 for love
you get rid of frye and thompson you free up 22 mil, nobody said it would be easy, but to keep the eventual ROY then sign love you make it happenLebrons cap hit that year was 23M and Kyries was 17M combining for 40M. The cap was 70M. 40M + 28M you have listed above is 68M. Then you factor in cap holds which are about 500K-1M per roster spot not filled adding in an additional 5-10M. Also, you are not factoring in Wiggin's salary if they kept him. Thats another 7M.
They werent pulling 20M out of their *** unless they traded or let everyone on their team walk other than Kyrie and Lebron. Even if they did free up everyone other than lebron and Kyrie (which was likely not possible) the would have had just enough to offer him like 13M a year.
you get rid of frye and thompson you free up 22 mil
no 2k logic is giving thompson 14 milNBA 2K GM logic in there at present.