- May 31, 2006
- 13,144
- 8,857
A&M, though?
OFFICIAL 2017 COLLEGE FOOTBALL OFFSEASON THREAD - Spring Game schedule on first page
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by Bobby Layne,
- Start date
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,036
- 85,628
Y'all MAD?! SEC SEC SECCFB playoff rankings
1. Bama
2. Clemson
3. Michigan
4. Texas A&M
5. Washington
6. Ohio State
SEC
- Jul 12, 2013
- 19,284
- 20,126
Buffs though at #15 
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,403
- 195,815
CFB playoff rankings
1. Bama
2. Clemson
3. Michigan
4. Texas A&M
5. Washington
6. Ohio State
SEC
- May 31, 2006
- 13,144
- 8,857
UNC #21 though. Just need complete and utter chaos the rest of the season and we in there. 
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,233
- 53,418
man BS that the Huskies were left out IMO
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,036
- 85,628
Strength of schedule and OOC lackluster.
swendro
formerly swendro88
- Aug 1, 2005
- 13,016
- 9,399
The polls mean next to nothing at this point.
- Jul 12, 2013
- 19,284
- 20,126
Its probably just a troll by the ranking committee to get people to talk about it.... Build the hype
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,461
- 12,585
Max Browne granted permission to contact by USC. He's gone.
USC signed Max's paperwork so he can talk to any team immediately, including within conference.
USC signed Max's paperwork so he can talk to any team immediately, including within conference.
Last edited:
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,403
- 195,815
I see you Ty Willingham
- Apr 27, 2009
- 19,563
- 6,839
They've literally played nobody good. With that said i agree it's BS they were left out.
- Jul 11, 2006
- 33,461
- 12,585
The Huskies went the Baylor route with scheduling. The committee is treating them like they did Baylor. That said if they win out, they're in over A&M. They're not gonna win out though.
Last edited:
swendro
formerly swendro88
- Aug 1, 2005
- 13,016
- 9,399
they aren't left out though. there's still what, 4-5 weeks to go.
- Jul 12, 2013
- 19,284
- 20,126
The problem is though that so did Bama and TAM. These clowns keep talking about how great TAM's out of conference schedule was... Here is TAM OOC opponents:
UCLA
PVAM (Not even sure what that acronym is for)
NMSU
UTSA
.... look at that powerful out of conference scheduling that TAM went with.
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,036
- 85,628
UCLA was ranked at the time they played A&M though, that alone is better than what Washington has, as is their win over Auburn as well in conference right now. That's really the difference, but at this point they can't afford a loss at all even if they end up winning the conference. A&M also still has LSU which could be still ranked at the end of the season, Huskies need to hope that Leach keeps winning.
Last edited:
- May 30, 2006
- 25,304
- 13,356
Play somebody with a pulse.
If they win out, they'll get in. But when you schedule that ****** and your conference is "down", you don't get any leeway.
The initial ranking is engineered to drum up debate. They showed last year it'll fluctuate every week.
DeadsetAce
Supporter
- May 31, 2004
- 107,233
- 53,418
meh...Huskies been crushing teams they should be crushing. A&M's just been winning
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,036
- 85,628
And they barely won against the first team they had with an actual pulse.
- Jun 17, 2006
- 7,309
- 1,984
LOL at talking about TAMU's OOC schedule when Washington played Rutgers, Idaho, and Portland State
Not sure your helping any point you're trying to make there...
Using Sagarin rankings, TAMU's SOS is 23, Washington's is 69...
Not sure your helping any point you're trying to make there...
Using Sagarin rankings, TAMU's SOS is 23, Washington's is 69...
MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,036
- 85,628
LSU's schedule this last month
Hopefully they start the chaos with a win against Bama Sat though
- Jul 12, 2013
- 19,284
- 20,126
I don't understand the argument of "They were ranked when they played them"... Oregon was ranked #24 at the start of the season, Notre dame was ranked #10, Michigan state was #12, Stanford was #9, UCLA #16, LSU was #5... and so on... The pac 12 WAS ranked very high at the start of the season, so all these UW wins against a great conference should count for something then?
- Apr 27, 2009
- 19,563
- 6,839
Whiskies barely beat Utah a couple days ago. Their big win was destroying an Oregon team with the worst defense on college football and a true freshmans first career start at QB
- Jul 12, 2013
- 19,284
- 20,126
LOL at talking about TAMU's OOC schedule when Washington played Rutgers, Idaho, and Portland State
Not sure your helping any point you're trying to make there...
Using Sagarin rankings, TAMU's SOS is 23, Washington's is 69...
They are both pathetic OOC schedules. But all the guys on ESPN right now are saying that TAM's OOC is so much better than UW. That is highly debatable, and I would say flat out wrong. Conf schedule is a different matter though.
- Jun 17, 2006
- 7,309
- 1,984
This week could potentially be amazing for me. In Chicago right now, going to Baton Rouge this weekend.
If the Cubs could win in 7 and LSU upsets Bama
