- 43,190
- 28,348
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2003
How do you not, at the very least, get a first round pick?
Fam.
Fam.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I get that, but that doesn’t excuse getting back absolute trash. With all the talk of the Knicks holding off talking because offers weren’t good enough, you’d think they would have had some sort of standard.This trade was more about a fresh start for both sides than getting back a top pick/player.
There is a 1st rd pickHow do you not, at the very least, get a first round pick?
Fam.
I get that, but that doesn’t excuse getting back absolute trash. With all the talk of the Knicks holding off talking because offers weren’t good enough, you’d think they would have had some sort of standard.
To think that, in a fresh start type of move like this one where you move your Superstar vet in favor in allowing the youth to take over and grow together, how is the best you can do, or the least you’d take back Chicago’s SECOND round pick? It defies logic, but we know logic never applies with this franchise.
You either aim for picks or young talent in return, we got neither. That’s wild, but not really. It is the Knicks.
So why not request a late first rounder? Does OKC not own their first round pick in 2018?The NTC really limited what Perry Mills could do. The contract basically guaranteed us taking back a big deal so it was either Kanter or Anderson. Kanter has 1, maybe 2, years left on his deal compared to Anderson’s 3.
Chicago’s 2nd round pick is basically a late 1st so I’m not too mad about that.
Over/Under 50 points?We open the season in OKC.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Terrible trade. Should have kept Melo and waited for better offers.
Melo in a Thunder uniform is just some f*ckery
Should've retired a Knick ::::