MVP
Supporter
- Feb 28, 2008
- 83,036
- 85,628
I don't think there's need for more Jumpmans there are quite enough in the world methinks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Raptors will shock the NationsThe 6Uh, because the thunder have a huge drop off after Russ and Kevin....And golden state does not. They have players on the bench that would start for OKC. Like, most series are won by depth...not necessarily the stars.
Where is that verbatim quote again? @a-friend
Bruh, we aren't going to see eye to eye on this so whatever. You're saying one thing I'm saying something else, not even sure we are concerned with arguing the same thing at this point, it's been 6 or 7 or 8 or 9 days or something since the importance of bench was even brought up. I'm willing to say I was wrong or you were right or agree to disagree or whatever, I'm not going to debate this with you for the next 2 months though,
According to this one website Thunder has like a 64% chance of making the finals. Thoughts?
Full odds:
Thunder 64% then 42%
Warriors 36% then 29%
Cavs 71% then 23%
Raptors 29% then 6%
first being making finals second being winning
Stephen A speaking that gospel today
Yep, i wonder what people said about curry going 1/6 game 1 and in game 3 in the 3rd qtr and yucking it up with Steve Kerr down by 40 on the road.... hmm quite interesting [emoji]129300[/emoji]I don't care to. I just laugh at how dudes in here hold Lebron at a higher standard while at the same time claim Steph is better. **** is funny.
People probably said the same thing when Lebron lost by 40 points in the NBA finals to the Spurs.
Yep, i wonder what people said about curry going 1/6 game 1 and in game 3 in the 3rd qtr and yucking it up with Steve Kerr down by 40 on the road.... hmm quite interesting [emoji]129300[/emoji]
You can go back through the thread and find out. Idk what yall want. The most recent game is being discussed, it is what it is.Yep, i wonder what people said about curry going 1/6 game 1 and in game 3 in the 3rd qtr and yucking it up with Steve Kerr down by 40 on the road.... hmm quite interesting [emoji]129300[/emoji]I don't care to. I just laugh at how dudes in here hold Lebron at a higher standard while at the same time claim Steph is better. **** is funny.
Reported. Terrible attempt at trolling.Bismack Biyombo reminds me of Hakeem in his prime
Well to be fair, he didn't play the 4th at all last game0 points in final 5 mins of the game, that's not best in the world material.
But but but but....Steph disappeared in the 4th too.Yep, i wonder what people said about curry going 1/6 game 1 and in game 3 in the 3rd qtr and yucking it up with Steve Kerr down by 40 on the road.... hmm quite interesting [emoji]129300[/emoji]
Bismack Biyombo reminds me of Hakeem in his prime
Reported. Terrible attempt at trolling.
He's almost as old as Hakeem was when he won his ringsNo doubt he think he HakeemBismack Biyombo reminds me of Hakeem in his prime
Are you sure? Are you sure he is not older than Hakeem is now?
He's almost as old as Hakeem was when he won his rings
Not allowed? There's an entire thread for it: http://niketalk.com/t/645552/warrio...to-arms-haters-unification-thread-vol-why-notit's like we not allowed to criticize Steph.Steph has bad games and it's real quite around here.
very rare solid post in this threadRe-watched the fourth quarter.
Cavs started 11-11 in the fourth running a variation of this set. Essentially Biyombo had to decide whether to guard Bron on the roll or Frye spotting up. Whoever he ignored would be wide open.
Occasionally RJ would pop open for the easy layup.
Casey never tried to stop it either. Didn't switch up his coverage or anything. Baffling. They got one lucky stop & then luckily for him, the Cavs just went away from it in the last few mins.
And on the other end Lowry & DD made all those difficult iso shots. And that was it.
Cavs have been running that since game 1 & Casey hasn't changed anything. So I'm not really sure how they win the series if DD & Lowry start missing those tough contested shots. They obviously have a chance if those 2 continue to combine for 60+
Yep.Re-watched the fourth quarter.
Cavs started 11-11 in the fourth running a variation of this set. Essentially Biyombo had to decide whether to guard Bron on the roll or Frye spotting up. Whoever he ignored would be wide open.
Occasionally RJ would pop open for the easy layup.
Casey never tried to stop it either. Didn't switch up his coverage or anything. Baffling. They got one lucky stop & then luckily for him, the Cavs just went away from it in the last few mins.
And on the other end Lowry & DD made all those difficult iso shots. And that was it.
Cavs have been running that since game 1 & Casey hasn't changed anything.
Fixed.So I'm not really sure how they win the seriesif(when) DD & Lowry start missing those tough contested shots. They obviously have a chance if those 2 continue to combine for 60+
Re-watched the fourth quarter.
Cavs started 11-11 in the fourth running a variation of this set. Essentially Biyombo had to decide whether to guard Bron on the roll or Frye spotting up. Whoever he ignored would be wide open.
Occasionally RJ would pop open for the easy layup.
Casey never tried to stop it either. Didn't switch up his coverage or anything . Baffling. They got one lucky stop & then luckily for him, the Cavs just went away from it in the last few mins.
And on the other end Lowry & DD made all those difficult iso shots. And that was it.
Cavs have been running that since game 1 & Casey hasn't changed anything . So I'm not really sure how they win the series if DD & Lowry start missing those tough contested shots. They obviously have a chance if those 2 continue to combine for 60+
Not allowed? There's an entire thread for it: http://niketalk.com/t/645552/warrio...to-arms-haters-unification-thread-vol-why-notit's like we not allowed to criticize Steph. Steph has bad games and it's real quite around here.
In here? Of course it's allowed... but not allowed to dominate. The thread works best when no topic dominates. Not Bron stanning. Not Bron hate. Not Steph/Warriors stanning. Not Steph/Warriors hate. Hell, we've talked about cookies and how close people think they know their wife/girlfriend. BUt just for a bit, then back to the playoffs.
What does dominate mean? I mean, when you scroll through the the thread and it's one topic... for HOURS... and the same people keeping that topic going...
It continues to bottle my mind that people need this explained. Like I seriously wonder if people are like this irl.
"Sucks that so-and-so got fired."
"Yeah... but idc. Warriors play tonight."
"Hey! Anyone make coffee yet?"
"No idea. I was looking up Draymond stats. He is REALLY good!"
"Who's cooking lunch in the cafeteria today?"
"I know Chef Curry will be cooking tonight! I know THAT!"
"I hate Lebron."
"Go Warriors!"
"2-4 smh"
"BACK 2 BACK!
"Lebby's so frail."
"Splash Brothers!"
Annoying af when I meet these people irl, but I guess I'm one of the few out here willing to be a jerk and tell them, "Dude, we don't care. People only respond to try and shut you up so they can maybe change the subject to something else after obliging you."