- Jun 1, 2011
- 107,063
- 79,469
hey peep how come all these washed bigs from houston revive their career with the lakers?
Cause trash players tend to shine on trash teams.
Getting washed by Evan freaking turner
Yikes.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
hey peep how come all these washed bigs from houston revive their career with the lakers?
Getting washed by Evan freaking turner
CB34 calling KG a borderline HOFer
CB is an idiot.
CB34 calling KG a borderline HOFer
CB is an idiot.
The Hawks are the worst fanbase in basketball. Thats my thing.
please don't tell me he's from down here.that's because you and your bro bro would rather be fans of the Spurs and Lakers than the hometown team.
that's because you and your bro bro would rather be fans of the Spurs and Lakers than the hometown team.The Hawks are the worst fanbase in basketball. Thats my thing.
Maybe he should worry about making the playoffs instead of beating the Cavs. They're only two games away from missing the playoffs at the moment.He's coming. Sooner than you guys think. They're capable this year. Depends on Middleton getting healthy.
Question......how come we can take a movie from 1942 and make it HD and crystal clear but take an NBA game from the 90's and it looks so bad?
NBA messed up. Abc/ESPN messed up rather. Great answer man, thanks.Question......how come we can take a movie from 1942 and make it HD and crystal clear but take an NBA game from the 90's and it looks so bad?
The short answer is that those films from the 40s were shot in HD (35/70mm film) and then scaled down. Unless the NBA was filming games on 35mm film on the side, which is very unlikely, you won't be getting any HD games from the 90s.
Movies are shot on film. NBA games in the 90s were shot on standard definition video.
Question......how come we can take a movie from 1942 and make it HD and crystal clear but take an NBA game from the 90's and it looks so bad?
Because GMs hate what GSW did with KD.I've done the math over and over. But I still can't figure out why teams in the east continue to feed Cleveland more pieces. Teams are all offering their best players to Cleveland like a ritual sacrifice. Might as well tell them "hey lebron you missed a spot" and give them Millsap too. Send Millsap to Cleveland for a 2022 2nd round pick and a Gatorade buy 1 get 1 free coupon. Why not.
Question......how come we can take a movie from 1942 and make it HD and crystal clear but take an NBA game from the 90's and it looks so bad?
Learned things.
Question......how come we can take a movie from 1942 and make it HD and crystal clear but take an NBA game from the 90's and it looks so bad?
Movies are shot on film. NBA games in the 90s were shot on standard definition video.
Film has a much higher resolution than standard definition video.
Being an analogue medium, you can't really reduce film's resolution to numbers, but most estimate 35mm film to have a 4K resolution, which is 3840 x 2160 pixels. Then there is the whole issue of different types of film stock. Some are more grainy than others, so you might not see much of a difference between film scanned at 2K (bascially a HD 1920 x 1080 resolution) and 4K.
Standard definition video, which NBA games from the 90s were recorded with, on the other hand has a MUCH lower resolution, at only 640 x 480 pixels:
View media item 2288743
Furthermore, it has a more square-ish 4:3 aspect ratio, and not a wide-screen aspect ratio like modern TVs:
View media item 2288744
Which is why I've noticed when NBA show footage of older games, they either stretch, crop, or cut off sides of the image by zooming in so that the standard definition aspect ratio "fits" the HD aspect ratio better and avoid black bars:
View media item 2288745
Which is crap, I would rather have the full image with black bars, or have them fill the black bars with some graphic.
I know that there is plenty of very old NBA footage that was shot on film that could be made to look amazing. But film restoration is expensive.
Learned things.Movies are shot on film. NBA games in the 90s were shot on standard definition video.
Question......how come we can take a movie from 1942 and make it HD and crystal clear but take an NBA game from the 90's and it looks so bad?
Film has a much higher resolution than standard definition video.
Being an analogue medium, you can't really reduce film's resolution to numbers, but most estimate 35mm film to have a 4K resolution, which is 3840 x 2160 pixels. Then there is the whole issue of different types of film stock. Some are more grainy than others, so you might not see much of a difference between film scanned at 2K (bascially a HD 1920 x 1080 resolution) and 4K.
Standard definition video, which NBA games from the 90s were recorded with, on the other hand has a MUCH lower resolution, at only 640 x 480 pixels:
Furthermore, it has a more square-ish 4:3 aspect ratio, and not a wide-screen aspect ratio like modern TVs:
Which is why I've noticed when NBA show footage of older games, they either stretch, crop, or cut off sides of the image by zooming in so that the standard definition aspect ratio "fits" the HD aspect ratio better and avoid black bars:
Which is crap, I would rather have the full image with black bars, or have them fill the black bars with some graphic.
I know that there is plenty of very old NBA footage that was shot on film that could be made to look amazing. But film restoration is expensive.
GP back in the Turner studio with KG tonight. This could be high comedy.
Steve Nash: Durant joining the Warriors is "the same thing LeBron did as a free agent the last two times."