antidope
Supporter
- Jan 2, 2012
- 63,514
- 68,037
I hate Paul Pierce, but I gotta respect that man for what he's done. He's a gamer and one of the greats.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The whole Internet seemed to like to poke fun every time Rose got hurt. Dudes be posting memes and stuff
But now that he is playing well, the same Internet agree that Rose playing well is a 'good story'
If Rose gets hurt again, y'all will just turn on him again smh
blame/thank scotty.. if he had actually played funaki earlier, it wouldn't have gotten to that
Does generating the three pointers count as making them? They might as well.The last four NBA champions were "jump shooting teams"
This keeps getting brought up, but did the last 4 nba champions rely on their best player to shoot 3's? I think having Lebron, Duncan, Parker, etc. really gave those teams a different dynamic. If a team primarily led by two elite shooters win the title, I would say that's a first. Its not more so about them being a jump shooting team, but the fact their two best players rely on the 3 ball.
Is this a serious comment? Look at the points in the paint for those teams...and the shots taken within 15 feet of the basket. You don't have to have a post player to not be labeled a jump shooting team. Heck the only team with old school post players is Memphis.
This keeps getting brought up, but did the last 4 nba champions rely on their best player to shoot 3's? I think having Lebron, Duncan, Parker, etc. really gave those teams a different dynamic. If a team primarily led by two elite shooters win the title, I would say that's a first. Its not more so about them being a jump shooting team, but the fact their two best players rely on the 3 ball.
Does generating the three pointers count as making them? They might as well.
Does generating the three pointers count as making them? They might as well.
Only 1 of those players won anything w/o him. So you can't discredit the system THAT much.
Um what?
He got them all in the prime of their careers, Kobe TWICE.
You expect 40 year old MJ to win a ring wth the Wizards? Or 38 year old Pippen to win with the Trailblazers?
There's many coaches that could've won rings with the talent he was blessed with. I think he was better at creating a psychological environment that produced winning than being great at coaching basketball.
He was more guru than game master, which is fine but failing to adapt to the times when you don't have any generational talent is a game you'll lose.
Same reason I don't believe the Knicks will ever succeed if he doesn't change his views and built a modern team.
Haven't read much of the thread today so if I'm saying things someone else already said, my bad.
But shooting a lot of 3's is fine. Clips were one of the top 5 best 3pt shooting teams in the league this year. They have an anchor though, and their two best players aren't reliant on the 3 point line. Huge difference.
I've changed my stance on the jump shooting team winning thing. You can win with shooting, but your best players can't be reliant on jumpshots to win. It's just too hard and too easy to gameplan against that. Eventually, the 3's and shots won't fall.