- Oct 13, 2001
- 160,884
- 142,769
Nah I am saying that the Wizards felt like they should have paid Wall that money because they want him to be the face of their franchise.And again who is your girl because it sounds like you're making a case that the Wizards may have overpaid for Wall.
Is your girl say a Selita Ebanks who may be the equivalent to say a Steph Curry?
While in a vacuum he might be overpaid, when you factor in all considerations, he got what he was "worth."
Remember worth is whatever someone is willing to give you.
Yes, Wall hasn't done anything to show he deserves that money but maybe they see something in the future?