- Feb 2, 2013
- 936
- 108
#28 Gene Tunney (65-1-1; Newspaper Decisions 15-0-3)
Readers of this series may have noticed the tendency amongst even the greatest fighters to drop numerous losses in newspaper decisions. These were fights where the boxers were fighting to “no decision,” that is, the rules of the time and place they fought in did not allow a decision to be rendered in a prizefight, so there would be no official victor in the event that the two remained on their feet at the end of the agreed distance. Newspapermen in attendance would have their say the next day but there was no “official” victor. Many fighters slacked off in such contests. During the era and for many years afterwards, no-decision bouts were reported as just that when a fighter’s record was being discussed, the fight regarded as neither a win nor a loss but a no-decision—so what was the difference?
Doubtless Gene Tunney did not see it that way. In all his eighty-six fights, including the eighteen no-decisions he competed in, Tunney officially lost just once. This is extraordinary. Even the other greats who competed in nearly ninety contests during a career that spanned more than ten years have many more losses to excuse.
Of course, he was lucky. After Harry Greb gave him the beating of a lifetime in their 1922 affair, his face so distorted by Greb’s punches that “The Fighting Marine” avoided family and friends for days afterwards, the two fought a rematch which reads like a blatant robbery for Gene (an “unjustifiable” verdict according to New York commissioner William Muldoon, and almost every other unbiased observer). Tunney can be credited for agreeing to a third fight in 1923, which he won clearly, a fourth fight was then seen by most as a draw. In the fifth fight Tunney finally proved his clear superiority, winning a one-sided decision in 1925 but by this time Gene was a 186-pound heavyweight and Greb had begun to slip, blind in one eye and past his best.
There are other concerns about Tunney’s opposition. Tommy Gibbons was ring-worn and had been chasing Tunney for years by the time they met; Carpentier was past his best, having lost two of his last five; Tommy Loughran was young and green when Tunney and he boxed a draw and the fact that they were never rematched is peculiar. Jack Dempsey, famously, was nothing like his magical best when Tunney twice outpointed him for the heavyweight title.
I personally have some sympathy with this point of view. Tunney’s best opposition tended to be notably smaller than he or past prime, and he never matched a black contender in a very carefully handled—one might almost say stage-managed—career. But there are still those eighty wins to weigh against a single loss, a loss that came against a fighter who would surprise absolutely nobody were he to appear at #1 in this list, a fighter that Tunney showed great determination, mental strength and brilliance in eventually mastering. More, like Michael Spinks he lifted the heavyweight title as a former light-heavyweight. No mean feat against a great champion, whatever his condition.