- 70,049
- 24,223
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
There's zero chance NY gets back to how it was in the 90s because of cash bail being eliminated
u sure u wanna bet? shoplifting Definitely gonna be supercharged.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
There's zero chance NY gets back to how it was in the 90s because of cash bail being eliminated
Charges aren't bring dropped. But it does make for repeat offenders to wreck havoc on an area without any sense of consequence
u sure u wanna bet? shoplifting Definitely gonna be supercharged.
Bruh, shoplifting is not what you meant by that comment. You were clearly insinuating violent crimes are going to surge
ninjahood once described his posting history as an attempt to keep the General page fresh. But I think there’s something else that ties his threads together.
I’ve often wondered if you get paid for the kind of race-baiting, anti-science, fear propaganda. I can’t call it.
But I do get the sense that something in your past scarred you. You seem to be invested in a story of crime waves, murder, mayhem. For you the 1980s, through which you did not live, has scarred your mind. The experiences of friends and family, reinforced by rap tales and movies, has made you into a frightened New Yorker who believes their safety is predicated on trusting a racist institution (which would gladly lock you up and deport you, and tell you, whoops!). There is no hope or optimism except through obedience to an authoritarian state. The irony of you railing against the ‘nanny state.’
How you could suggest that in NYC, one of the most heavily surveilled cities in the world, crime will be rampant is beyond me. You cite material from the PBA, the protective bullies association, as objective; completely unaware of the history of a vested interest of law enforcement to thwart bail reform efforts.
What happened to you? How did you become the useful idiot?
. For you the 1980s, through which you did not live
You literally said the 90s. Stop being an idiot. You're not talking about shoplifting while posting a list of crimes that cash bail will no longer be required for. You can't even be consistent on what you're trying to prove. Goofy.son u really gonna act like you ain't read da thread title b?
stop assuming cuz you make an..you get da point.
- Patronizing a person for prostitution in a school zone
- Promoting an obscene sexual performance by a child
- Possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child
- Promoting a sexual performance by a child
- Failure to register as a sex offender
You literally said the 90s
Animal fighting
Shoplifting about to be running wild! That was your pointanyone that can read understood when i said 90's i meant crime gonna tick up, not become da wild wild west da 80's were....how bout stop assuming cuz already lookin like da backside of a
Shoplifting about to be running wild! That was your point
Thanks for posting this. I always like reading arguments for the other side, even if I don't agree with it. I'll post more opinions on it tomorrow (I need to start getting ready for tonight's festivities).Here’s a useful summary of the new law:
https://www.vera.org/downloads/publications/new-york-new-york-2019-bail-reform-law-highlights.pdf
Upshot: “The final bill that passed eliminated money bail and mandated release for 90 percent of all arrests statewide.”(
Approach to bail reform: “The overall framework of the new law takes a charge-based approach, where the level of the offense and the specific charge— whether it is a misdemeanor, nonviolent felony, or violent felony”(9). Eligibility is contingent on the kind of offense.
Possible Outcomes: recognizance; Pre-trial non-cash conditions (9)
Qualifications: those accused of misdemeanors are eligible, “except in sex-related misdemeanors and one specific domestic violence charge, criminal contempt, based on allegations of violating a stay-away order.”(9)
Those accused of felony charges not released on recognizance may be subject to electric monitoring (9).
So a person who grew up in a city full of immigrants can't differentiate nationality based on observation????
Man, we have a lot of work to do as a country.
I have nothing to say to you bro... No one cares about your opinion.... Lol go back to watching my every keystroke....Just FYI to anyone arguing with this dude: he’s a flat earther who repeatedly claims that math and science are fake concepts. I know he’s gonna come back at me with another insult about how he’s more intelligent than my entire lineage, but I don’t care; I’m just helping you guys manage your own time and effort by letting you know what type of person you’re dealing with.
So you telling me you can't tell the difference between guatamalans and Brazilians??? That's racist.... They looking nothing alike...Except there are thousands of Guatemalan, Brazilian and Nicaraguan folks in and around the Boston area and other major cities that ride around in vans and over pack apartments. They also provide cheap labor, from masonry to roofing. paving, painting. Many happen to be legal citizens or on work visas, etc. So you can't tell if someone is "legal" based on looking at them. To say so is racist plain and simple. You saw someone you didn't approve of and attached a negative label to them based on the way they look.