- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,840
- 30,230
Colts +6.5
Rams/Seahawks - Under 43
Rams/Seahawks - Under 43
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hold off until the divisional round. As discussed this week, there's no value in Bucs ML and I don't think Tampa covers the 9 points even if Heinicke is WFT QB.I want to put money on the Buccaneers because I'm a fan but which one?
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Moneyline -400
Spread- 8 (-120)
Hold off until the divisional round. As discussed this week, there's no value in Bucs ML and I don't think Tampa covers the 9 points even if Heinicke is WFT QB.
Already know a good chunk of parlays ruined by the Rams game
Unless somehow they face the Bears, this'll be the easiest team they'll playHold off until the divisional round. As discussed this week, there's no value in Bucs ML and I don't think Tampa covers the 9 points even if Heinicke is WFT QB.
Already know a good chunk of parlays ruined by the Rams game
Taking the ML on an 8 pt favorite
yeah that’s a bed bet
His point is it doesnt really add value bro. Bucks were like -800 yesterday. They didnt really add much value to that 6 leg parlay, and factor in you need 6 different events to go your way.Bro I told you ML Favorites are GREAT BETS.
Hit yesterday Bills Bucs Denver Nuggets Heat Spurs Bucks .
6 team ML parlays. All favored All didn't cover the spread but that ML comes in handy.
His point is it doesnt really add value bro. Bucks were like -800 yesterday. They didnt really add much value to that 6 leg parlay, and factor in you need 6 different events to go your way.
Its not really the best value
Titans +3.5
Cavs pts wouldve gave you better value than bucks ML if you felt bucks werent gonna coverBut If i would have picked Bucs Spread I would have lost. When I went to place my bet they were at -10. WAYYYY to much.
Cavs pts wouldve gave you better value than bucks ML if you felt bucks werent gonna cover
Numbers say otherwise. Especially dogs on the road.nah i hear you and just like the other dude was saying. But I trust those ML favorite more than the under dogs I feel like the Underdog percetage of them hitting the number be like 20-25 % I feel like the ML covering is like 90%.
I understand about the value, but combined with the parlay it evens it out and I trust those ML rather than the under dog covering the spread