- Aug 1, 2005
- 1,108
- 10
Originally Posted by RiverXBear
The US better choose there words carefully there is prolly some people backing NK because they wouldn't talk wreckless with out numbers.
you sound like the messenger from 300
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by RiverXBear
The US better choose there words carefully there is prolly some people backing NK because they wouldn't talk wreckless with out numbers.
I am. Doesnt take away from the fact that your statement was ignorant as hell.Originally Posted by JrockNIKErock
^you must be korean!
Originally Posted by Essential1
Originally Posted by RockyBalboa25
I always see you calling other people idiots and what not yet you are going to sit here and say that Bush is responsible for 9/11. The event that was planned and put into action during Clinton's presidency while terrorism wasn't a high priority. The event that occurred less than 8 months into Bush's presidency. If people are going to pull the 'Obama needs time to fix all of the economic problems that Bush left him' than the same can easily be applied to Bush needed time to fix the problems that Clinton left him. After 2001, people might not have liked Bush very much but how many terrorist attacks did we have in the US?Originally Posted by Essential1
because our Great President Bush who kept us safe (except for 9/11 and Anthrax) ignored it.. Believe me Obama is not some unitelligent silver spoon who got handed his position in life. If you don't think Obama, Gates, Clinton & Biden are not taking it serious you got a problem.. The reason they aren't screaming the world is on fire is because you can't have panic of the people.Originally Posted by smoothrick007
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
Originally Posted by smoothrick007
im not under 18. just saying though..u never know..correct me if im wrong but did we not think bin laden wasnt gonna do %$#% before 2001? and look what happened...
That's called ignoring intelligience briefings.
because we didnt think they were gonna do anything? or why did we ignore it?
"Only thing to fear is fear itself."
While I don't think North Korea is going to do anything soon (within the next year or so), I would rather blow things out of proportion now and be safe later than sit back and chill, waiting for something to actually to happen.
While you theoretically have a point I will react with this:
1/25/2001; Memo warning Bush Administration of Al-Qeada and an eminent attack, asking for an intelligence meeting (never got a meeting)
8/6/2001: Memos that Osama Bin Ladin is planning an attack on the U.S.
9/4/2001; Memo about an attack on U.S. that would leave 100s dead
Three most important memos of many Crafted by Richard Clarke.. and you know what Cheney's response was to it this month. Richard Clarke missed it... Yes I can sit here and blame Bush for the largest attack on American soil when he was warned it will happen. And did nothing... It is his fault. HE FAILED TO KEEP US SAFE.
If I were a cop and someone told me you would get robbed and I didn't do anything. You get robbed, in response I start protecting you and I kept you from getting robbed. Then say well I kept you from getting robbed when in actuality I didn't because I let you get robbed the first time.
Originally Posted by Keithdajuiceman
Originally Posted by 3miyasaki3
I'm ok...but kim jong is ill
Your parents are Republicans aren't they?Originally Posted by RockyBalboa25
I always see you calling other people idiots and what not yet you are going to sit here and say that Bush is responsible for 9/11. The event that was planned and put into action during Clinton's presidency while terrorism wasn't a high priority. The event that occurred less than 8 months into Bush's presidency. If people are going to pull the 'Obama needs time to fix all of the economic problems that Bush left him' than the same can easily be applied to Bush needed time to fix the problems that Clinton left him. After 2001, people might not have liked Bush very much but how many terrorist attacks did we have in the US?Originally Posted by Essential1
because our Great President Bush who kept us safe (except for 9/11 and Anthrax) ignored it.. Believe me Obama is not some unitelligent silver spoon who got handed his position in life. If you don't think Obama, Gates, Clinton & Biden are not taking it serious you got a problem.. The reason they aren't screaming the world is on fire is because you can't have panic of the people.Originally Posted by smoothrick007
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
Originally Posted by smoothrick007
im not under 18. just saying though..u never know..correct me if im wrong but did we not think bin laden wasnt gonna do %$#% before 2001? and look what happened...
That's called ignoring intelligience briefings.
because we didnt think they were gonna do anything? or why did we ignore it?
"Only thing to fear is fear itself."
While I don't think North Korea is going to do anything soon (within the next year or so), I would rather blow things out of proportion now and be safe later than sit back and chill, waiting for something to actually to happen.
Let's read carefully now. Guess the letter, I'll give you two of them.Originally Posted by LESfamilia
Well, um, yeah OP, you cited World Star Hip-Hop as the primary source of your information.
WSHH? The same site posting "Choppa Suit (Remix)" video's, right?
I think I'll take my chances here. Hooray for money, now we can buy all the nuclear fallout gear we want and the Liberals and Conservatives will both be happy! Teehehehehehehe...
Originally Posted by LESfamilia
Well, um, yeah OP, you cited World Star Hip-Hop as the primary source of your information.
WSHH? The same site posting "Choppa Suit (Remix)" video's, right?
I think I'll take my chances here. Hooray for money, now we can buy all the nuclear fallout gear we want and the Liberals and Conservatives will both be happy! Teehehehehehehe...
Originally Posted by TBONE95860
Originally Posted by Essential1
Originally Posted by RockyBalboa25
I always see you calling other people idiots and what not yet you are going to sit here and say that Bush is responsible for 9/11. The event that was planned and put into action during Clinton's presidency while terrorism wasn't a high priority. The event that occurred less than 8 months into Bush's presidency. If people are going to pull the 'Obama needs time to fix all of the economic problems that Bush left him' than the same can easily be applied to Bush needed time to fix the problems that Clinton left him. After 2001, people might not have liked Bush very much but how many terrorist attacks did we have in the US?Originally Posted by Essential1
because our Great President Bush who kept us safe (except for 9/11 and Anthrax) ignored it.. Believe me Obama is not some unitelligent silver spoon who got handed his position in life. If you don't think Obama, Gates, Clinton & Biden are not taking it serious you got a problem.. The reason they aren't screaming the world is on fire is because you can't have panic of the people.Originally Posted by smoothrick007
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
Originally Posted by smoothrick007
im not under 18. just saying though..u never know..correct me if im wrong but did we not think bin laden wasnt gonna do %$#% before 2001? and look what happened...
That's called ignoring intelligience briefings.
because we didnt think they were gonna do anything? or why did we ignore it?
"Only thing to fear is fear itself."
While I don't think North Korea is going to do anything soon (within the next year or so), I would rather blow things out of proportion now and be safe later than sit back and chill, waiting for something to actually to happen.
While you theoretically have a point I will react with this:
1/25/2001; Memo warning Bush Administration of Al-Qeada and an eminent attack, asking for an intelligence meeting (never got a meeting)
8/6/2001: Memos that Osama Bin Ladin is planning an attack on the U.S.
9/4/2001; Memo about an attack on U.S. that would leave 100s dead
Three most important memos of many Crafted by Richard Clarke.. and you know what Cheney's response was to it this month. Richard Clarke missed it... Yes I can sit here and blame Bush for the largest attack on American soil when he was warned it will happen. And did nothing... It is his fault. HE FAILED TO KEEP US SAFE.
If I were a cop and someone told me you would get robbed and I didn't do anything. You get robbed, in response I start protecting you and I kept you from getting robbed. Then say well I kept you from getting robbed when in actuality I didn't because I let you get robbed the first time.
Keep living in that alternate world where Bush is to blame for everything
See where that gets you, your liberal friends, and Obama in 2012 if nothing hardly gets better
Yeah, you and Obama keep doing it..... I'll appreciate it
Originally Posted by retr0sxual
Why do we let people like Kim Jong Lee get into power?
And Obama will win 2012
Not a chance dude. Obama wouldn't win a re-election if election day was today. He's already shown the majority of normal Americans that he has noclue what he is doing, other than pandering to the whims of the radical leftists who are pulling his strings. Not to mention his tax tax tax spend spend spendpolicies are pissing a whole lot of people off.
Originally Posted by LESfamilia
Well, um, yeah OP, you cited World Star Hip-Hop as the primary source of your information.
WSHH? The same site posting "Choppa Suit (Remix)" video's, right?
I think I'll take my chances here. Hooray for money, now we can buy all the nuclear fallout gear we want and the Liberals and Conservatives will both be happy! Teehehehehehehe...
And Obama will win 2012
LOL.
Obama has no grasp of what he's doing. Just another Ivy League elitist who thinks he cure the nations problems.
Originally Posted by FIRST B0RN
Your parents are Republicans aren't they?Originally Posted by RockyBalboa25
I always see you calling other people idiots and what not yet you are going to sit here and say that Bush is responsible for 9/11. The event that was planned and put into action during Clinton's presidency while terrorism wasn't a high priority. The event that occurred less than 8 months into Bush's presidency. If people are going to pull the 'Obama needs time to fix all of the economic problems that Bush left him' than the same can easily be applied to Bush needed time to fix the problems that Clinton left him. After 2001, people might not have liked Bush very much but how many terrorist attacks did we have in the US?Originally Posted by Essential1
because our Great President Bush who kept us safe (except for 9/11 and Anthrax) ignored it.. Believe me Obama is not some unitelligent silver spoon who got handed his position in life. If you don't think Obama, Gates, Clinton & Biden are not taking it serious you got a problem.. The reason they aren't screaming the world is on fire is because you can't have panic of the people.Originally Posted by smoothrick007
Originally Posted by Sorkoram
Originally Posted by smoothrick007
im not under 18. just saying though..u never know..correct me if im wrong but did we not think bin laden wasnt gonna do %$#% before 2001? and look what happened...
That's called ignoring intelligience briefings.
because we didnt think they were gonna do anything? or why did we ignore it?
"Only thing to fear is fear itself."
While I don't think North Korea is going to do anything soon (within the next year or so), I would rather blow things out of proportion now and be safe later than sit back and chill, waiting for something to actually to happen.