No Star Trek into Darkness thread?

I might try to get off (from work) early tomorrow and check this out.

For those who have already seen it... what's the word?

:lol: I don't wanna be IM3'd here.
 
Saw a sneak preview of this on Sunday.
Movie is dope.
Highly recommended.
Spock is a straight G in this one.
And theres a couple twists.
Dude from the original RocoCop who played Murphy is in it. Big role too.
 
I <3 this movie.  I'm not even a trekie.  You'd enjoy it even more if you are one.  Movie was dope.  So far so good for summer blockbusters.  I've enjoyed IM3, FF6, and Star Trek.  What's next Superman? 
pimp.gif
 
Not really excited to see this film, was more looking forward to Great Gatsby. Been hearing mixed reviews. I want to see it but not in a rush, I'm just not that excited even though I do want to see it because I liked the first one a lot. Not sure why I just don't feel the need to rush to see it like other summer films this year.
 
Really good movie. Just got back from watching it. Not a Trek fan but I found the twists to be pretty surprising.
 
i want to go see this movie based on watching the 3d trailer in imax when i went to see iron man.

do you guys think i'd be interested in it? i dont give a damn about star trek and never ever watched it.
 
^ I think you'll enjoy it, these two star trek films have been made so the average person who isn't really into star trek would like the films. I've never watched anything on star trek before the first movie and I loved it.

Checked it out tonight in the Imax dome, first time there. I thought it was too much, I'll just watch my movies in regular theaters next time :lol: as for the movie it was pretty good. Part one was better but not by much.
 
Last edited:
Wow. Not a fan of the show and old movies and didnt even see part one but this movie delivers.

Saw it in IMAX 3D and was blown away. Awesome 3D movie and great story. I was expecting lights, fireworks and space but the story was on point.
 
I might try to get off (from work) early tomorrow and check this out.

For those who have already seen it... what's the word?

:lol: I don't wanna be IM3'd here.

I am a Marvel fanboy and before the last Star Trek movie had never seen any Star Trek in my life.

That said Into Darkness>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>IM3.

Very solid movie. Makes me trust Abrams even more with Star Wars.
 
Last edited:
really good. not a trek fan but any means (at least pre jj abrams) but abrams has done a great job with the trek movies so far. 
 
Saw it on Wednesday night. Solid movie. I enjoyed the references to the past movies/show, and makes me want to watch them. I would recommend seeing this even if you're not a Star Trek fan.
 
Terrible movie and a slap in the face to Trek fans. The more I watch of Abrams work where he is a writer the more convinced I am he sucks.

This movie like its predecessor are full of your run of the mill plot holes but also those that are covered up by things that aren't even possible in that universe in any time period. For reference ST Voy was 100+ years after this so just imagine the tech gap. Now before you say I'm nitpicking I had actually forgave these issues after the first movie just becuase I had new ST to watch.

This movie goes a step further and enters the realm of blasphemy. This lazy bastard Abrams took one of the greatest plot points from ANY movie but another ST movie and reused it reversing roles and then having the characters use damn near the exact same lines (see STWOK). I almost walked out of the theater and I have never felt that way even for S3 which got a chorus of boos when the credits hit. This made every issue I had forgiven creep right back. Even if I ignore all of that the movie is very predictable with very minimal character development.

If you're a casual fan or not at all this may be enjoyable for you.
 
^ ^ ^
That's what I figure, I think it is similar case with IM3. Reviews are great but to those who are true fans, it's like the Mandarin fiasco all over again. I'm not a Trekkie so I don't know what was wrong with the first one so I did enjoy it plenty.
 
Never seen Star Trek at all.
What's the show about?
Do I need to see te first one to watch this?
Good action?
 
Terrible movie and a slap in the face to Trek fans. The more I watch of Abrams work where he is a writer the more convinced I am he sucks.

This movie like its predecessor are full of your run of the mill plot holes but also those that are covered up by things that aren't even possible in that universe in any time period. For reference ST Voy was 100+ years after this so just imagine the tech gap. Now before you say I'm nitpicking I had actually forgave these issues after the first movie just becuase I had new ST to watch.

This movie goes a step further and enters the realm of blasphemy. This lazy bastard Abrams took one of the greatest plot points from ANY movie but another ST movie and reused it reversing roles and then having the characters use damn near the exact same lines (see STWOK). I almost walked out of the theater and I have never felt that way even for S3 which got a chorus of boos when the credits hit. This made every issue I had forgiven creep right back. Even if I ignore all of that the movie is very predictable with very minimal character development.

If you're a casual fan or not at all this may be enjoyable for you.

I'm not a Trekkie by any means, but this does leave me alittle worried about how Abrams is gonna handle Star Wars where I think a good portion of NT is avid fans of.
 
Just posted this in the "Movies/TV thread".

Here it goes, Star Trek: Into The Darkness. Lets do it. :pimp:

Spoiler filled, so don't read until you've seen the movie OR don't care about any of this.

+++++++++++++++++ SPOILERS ++++++++++++++++++++

J.J. Abrams delivered on so many levels in this sequel. The Star Trek franchise, if he can keep pumping out entertaining (and more importantly, well done) sequels for as long as he wants to drag this out, will probably just end up being one of my favorite of all-time. I'm not a "trekkie" by any means, but the direction, effects, and storytelling in these movies so far have been spectacular. Abrams has been doing a great job of plucking actors in Hollywood that are close to blowing up.. for example...

Benedict Cumberbatch might just be on the cusp of stardom, man. We all know whether or not we've seen the show about his work in BBC's Sherlock, how that's highly praised, all of that. He conveys a lot with a simple look, and that's a crazy skill to possess if you're an actor. His speech when he was being held captive in the Enterprise about his people and how he was superior to Kirk, was nuts. His voice inflections and the way he just glared at Kirk like he was so ignorant and not worth anyone's time was perfect. The perfect guy to play Kahn, and I'm hoping he's not a goner and returns in the third, fourths, wherever Abrams ends up taking this.

Chris Pine was solid, and you're getting a sense he knows this right here is the peak of his career, the most famous role he'll ever hold. He was a high riser in 2009 when the first Star Trek was released, but ever since that released four years the only somewhat significant main roles he's played was in This Means War :smh:, and Unstoppable which many disagree on. With that in mind, he does a great job at playing Kirk, the brash, young gun that can't be held down. "I saved your life, you filed a report, I lost my ship." |I He and Quinto (guy who plays Spock) play so well off each other in these movies. And I really don't have to go into Quinto at all... he plays Spock to an absolute tee just like in the first, perfect casting. I was just :wow: when he was talking to Zoe Saldana about how he chooses not to feel after the annihilation of his planet, and hoping that she doesn't mistake that for him NOT caring. Brilliant.

And Alice Eve... I mean :wow: :evil: :smokin :pimp:

View media item 415203
It would've been freaking nice if Abrams had more than one, 2 second scene with her in anything but a jumpsuit, but she is gorgeous nonetheless. I just want to thank him for not putting Hunger Games Jennifer Dunst in that role.

:rofl: at Harold being captain of the Enterprise. Thought that was pretty cool, especially when you can't get get the image out of your head of him and Kumar on the couch watching White Castle commercials. :lol:

Simon Pegg was brilliant as always. As he was running back and forth on the "enemy" ship speaking to Spock and Kirk. :lol:

THAT SCENE WHERE KIRK AND KAHN ARE SHOOTING THROUGH SPACE TRYING TO LAND ON THE SHIP. DAMN :smokin I want to see it in 3D JUST for that. And hell man, this is a must-see in 3D after seeing in 2D. You could tell there were so many things included that were specifically for 3D, and since we've heard from people in the business that this movie is breathtaking in 3D, I think it'd be worth the extra 3-4 bucks or whatever.

For a film that has a run time of 132 minutes, did anyone freaking notice? This was one of the quickest over 2-hour movies I've seen in a LONG time. The pacing was incredible, and the only flaws I say it had was that Captain Kirk surviving was pretty predictable. I mean, I don't think Abrams would have the balls to cut him out of the franchise two movies in when there's still so much money left to be made, even though it would have been kind of a fresh take on an age-old movie cliche (main characters always survive and live out in the end no matter the peril).

Couple questions I have, and they may not even be able to answer by us, we might just have to wait for the next one.

1.) Since Kirk received a blood transfusion from Kahn, is he going to live until he's 300 now...? They mentioned that Kahn was 300 because his cells constantly regenerate, and now that Kirk has his blood...

2.) Any doubt that Kahn is going to be in the other sequels? There's gotta be a reason they let him survive.

Really great summer film, but just film in general. It gets a hard 9.5/10 for me. Abrams delivered, and I can't wait until the next installment. :pimp:
 
Back
Top Bottom