- Jun 1, 2008
- 38,406
- 7,519
we need screen caps
They're in the offseason thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
we need screen caps
Who was the guy looking for action before the game? Trying to get those Cavs believers to bet with him.
Now that they are 1 game down, I will take Cavs. You want to talk, PM me my dude.
Wait, are you serious?
it isn't even an overreaction. 5 straight nba finals, two rings, hands down best nba player for the last 10 years... just appreciate that we get to watch the guy. i'm sure in 20 years, this won't be much a controversy to say he is #1 or #2 all time.
its weird, people say things like "hes top 2 all time" because they actually think he's good enough to win with this current banged up cavs roster
but when he loses and proves that he's not good enough then they just ignore it and come back with the same misguided opinion next year
tomorrow, if kyries out, it's going to balloon into something like risking 370 to win 100 for warriors backersWas that you?
Yea, I'm serious, just give me the odds, whatever those are tomorrow.
I will take the Cavs to win it all.
And so we're clear, it's not really possible to put up money up front, BUT, that doesn't mean this isn't a real bet.
Nah I'm saying we slander son but people outside of our nt world will brush it off just like dude said "if he loses he loses". Like his resume isn't getting stamped, like bro if he loses he would be 2-6... If he never went to another finals he'd be 2-6. If he wins it would be one of the best stories and if he loses it would be one of the worse, he would be known as a loser and every time his name comes up in that argument people will bring it up. So it matters both ways, he better buy Jr a rello and some rose to wake him up.
2 rings is chump change when talking about top 10 all time guysit isn't even an overreaction. 5 straight nba finals, two rings, hands down best nba player for the last 10 years... just appreciate that we get to watch the guy. i'm sure in 20 years, this won't be much a controversy to say he is #1 or #2 all time.
its weird, people say things like "hes top 2 all time" because they actually think he's good enough to win with this current banged up cavs roster
but when he loses and proves that he's not good enough then they just ignore it and come back with the same misguided opinion next year
sorry for no thread update been such a bad day smh
I hope tomorrow is a better day for you G.
Much better.
its weird, people say things like "hes top 2 all time" because they actually think he's good enough to win with this current banged up cavs roster
but when he loses and proves that he's not good enough then they just ignore it and come back with the same misguided opinion next yearit isn't even an overreaction. 5 straight nba finals, two rings, hands down best nba player for the last 10 years... just appreciate that we get to watch the guy. i'm sure in 20 years, this won't be much a controversy to say he is #1 or #2 all time.
he means went to 6 finals won twiceTechnically he'd be 2-4Nah I'm saying we slander son but people outside of our nt world will brush it off just like dude said "if he loses he loses". Like his resume isn't getting stamped, like bro if he loses he would be 2-6... If he never went to another finals he'd be 2-6. If he wins it would be one of the best stories and if he loses it would be one of the worse, he would be known as a loser and every time his name comes up in that argument people will bring it up. So it matters both ways, he better buy Jr a rello and some rose to wake him up.
it isn't even an overreaction. 5 straight nba finals, two rings, hands down best nba player for the last 10 years... just appreciate that we get to watch the guy. i'm sure in 20 years, this won't be much a controversy to say he is #1 or #2 all time.
[thread="627574"]Quote:[/thread]
its weird, people say things like "hes top 2 all time" because they actually think he's good enough to win with this current banged up cavs roster
but when he loses and proves that he's not good enough then they just ignore it and come back with the same misguided opinion next year
it isn't even an overreaction. 5 straight nba finals, two rings, hands down best nba player for the last 10 years... just appreciate that we get to watch the guy. i'm sure in 20 years, this won't be much a controversy to say he is #1 or #2 all time.
Nah I'm saying we slander son but people outside of our nt world will brush it off just like dude said "if he loses he loses". Like his resume isn't getting stamped, like bro if he loses he would be 2-6... If he never went to another finals he'd be 2-6. If he wins it would be one of the best stories and if he loses it would be one of the worse, he would be known as a loser and every time his name comes up in that argument people will bring it up. So it matters both ways, he better buy Jr a rello and some rose to wake him up.
Technically he'd be 2-4
This is legacy defining for lebron. I don't see him losing this still. A lot of conclusion jumping after game 1, typical NT
5 straight finals means he's playing something like 100+ games per year for half a decade straight. the playoffs give you one night on one night off. lebron will defend all 5 positions while making his entire team better. say what you want. say horry is better than jordan and derek fisher is better than isaiah thomas. anyone with common sense and isn't biased about players of the past know bron is in the convo with jordan only.
2 rings is chump change when talking about top 10 all time guys
everyone on that list has 2 rings and over half of them have more than double
going to 5 straight finals doesnt mean anything, its about winning the whole thing